rjj04 wrote:I have been through macro and micro econ classes, read a few books otherwise on economic topics, and experienced life, but I am certainly not an economist.
I am just wondering why so many Americans think that their economic system is the best? I want to see the data that backs up the hubris I have seen over the last few decades. If the system is so much better than the "socialist" systems in Euroland or Canada, Australia, etc. then there must be a lot of data to back this up. Where is it? For the median citizen that is. Here is some data...
Canadian Family Median Net worth 2005
Age of head of household
< 35 18,750 $C
35-44 135,408
45-54 231,900
55-64 407,417
65+ 303,167
USA Family Median Net worth 2004
< 35 14.2K $US
35-44 69.4
45-54 144.7
55-64 197.4
65+ 177
am i missing something? I was a bit surprised by the data. The Canadian dollar is getting back to near par with the US dollar. Also, Canadian net worth is actually up since these numbers, whilst the US is down. Canadian real estate did not implode like the US, nor did its banking system. Perhaps more importantly, if you add in inflation and national debt load to the numbers here, the US drops dramatically, whilst Canada does not.
I also looked at taxes in Canada versus US, and the Canadian tax system actually seems to penalize wealth less than the US system.
Can somebody please enlighten me as to what I am missing? I am tired of hearing about the wonders of pure capitalism, whilst seeing the opposite in reality. I see Europeans getting 5 week paid vacation per year, free health care, less working hours per week, more job security, and more employee rights. I mean, if the American dream of becoming rich is seemingly not working out for the average bloke on the street, then what is the point of this blind faith in the nearly lassez faire system? Oh, forgot, it does work well for the top 5% though.

As an American I think what you're missing is a basic understanding of the capitalist system and who it rewards. It IS NOT a system designed to distribute wealth. It is designed to reward those who can work smarter, harder, and yes those who have superior intellect and/or generational wealth. In that regard the system has worked wonderfully well as evidenced by the following:
Total Net Worth (USA, year 2007)
Top 1% (of population)___34.5%
Next 19%______________50.5%
Bottom 80%____________15.0%
---------------------------------------
Financial Wealth (USA, year 2007)
Top 1% (of population)___42.7%
Next 19%______________50.3%
Bottom 80%_____________7.0%
* financial wealth = total net worth minus the value of one's home
-----------------------------------------
I'm a prime example of the 'average bloke on the street' to borrow your words.
At age 30 I had a net worth of $5,000 USD. I retired at age 48 with a net worth of 1.2M USD. I did it through a combination of working long hours, saving, investing, and hitting the economy at a good time (in other words lucky

). I did receive a small percentage of my net worth from my parents who have willed me some land.
As a contrast, my best friend in high school (also college education) squandered his money, had no investment strategy, and became an alcoholic. He commited suicide recently.
The American system seems to follow Mother Nature's course. The smarter and stronger rise to the top of the pack and get the 'good eats' while the others fight for the grisly 'leftovers'.
-------------------------------------------
To sum up, I think you're comparing apples & onions. One system is designed to cater to the whole will the other is designed to reward the few. That's why the 'median' charts you have presented favor Canada. Which system is 'better'? That question can be debated forever; depends on your POV.