![]() |
![]() |
|
Udon Airport | Local Transport | Tourism | Activities | Business Index | Advertise | Contact Us | Facebook | News |
parrot wrote:I'm always game for a little argument about folks like Tesco/7-11 infiltrating sleepy hollow. For me, it's all part of modernization.....and the folks in the villages should be entitled to it just as much as the folks in the city. Products are cleaner, fresher, generally cheaper and in greater variety than what's normally available in the village. There are about 10 small shops in my village and one modern Wee (7-11 lookalike) shop. The Wee shop has an ATM, chilled coolers with a wide variety of drinks, and ice-cream coolers that keep the ice-cream rock hard. Of course, if you don't frequent stores like Lotus/Makro/Big C at all, then you'd be entitled to defend the small village stores.
I'd make an exception for a small touristy type of town like Chiangkhan on the Mekong. A small Lotus would be okay on the outskirts of the town, but it'd ruin the town's ambiance if it were parked in the middle of 'downtown'. I couldn't say the same thing about most normal villages......it's all part of growing up.


Laan Yaa Mo wrote:Excuse me, but they did not vote in the current government. It took a little bit of gerrymandering via the judiciary, the army and the yellow shirts, to get these guys in. If given half a chance, the people just might take you up on it, and turn the current government out. In the meantime, alcohol might seem to be the better option.
parrot wrote:Products are cleaner, fresher, generally cheaper and in greater variety than what's normally available in the village.
Laan Yaa Mo wrote:Post by Laan Yaa Mo » October 12, 2010, 8:34 am
It is enlightening to see you admit that there are proper elections in Thailand. As for the hard questions, perhaps the Thais are taking a lesson from their fellow democrats in places like the United States, Canada et al where soft-ball questions are the order of the day.

Users browsing this forum: TomKe and 2 guests