Udon Thani Forum
Facebook twitter Youtube Rss
Ricefields Hotel Udon Thani

  • Advertisement
Chiang Rai Saddlebags

Brit government admits releasing al-Megrahi was a mistake

World news discussion forum

Brit government admits releasing al-Megrahi was a mistake

Postby Texpat » July 17, 2010, 12:45 pm

Release of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi a mistake, government says

Guardian
17 July 2010

The controversy surrounding the release of the man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing reignited yesterday after Britain's ambassador to the US said the government regretted the Scottish decision to free Abdelbaset al-Megrahi and considered it a "mistake".

Sir Nigel Sheinwald's remarks come amid claims by a group of Democrat senators that BP lobbied the British government to release Megrahi to help it secure an oil deal with Libya.

The US secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, is to look into the allegations, while the powerful Senate foreign relations committee will question BP executives at a special session later this month. The prisoner transfer agreement with Libya was signed in 2007 – the same year BP sealed a $900m (£584m) exploration agreement with Tripoli.

Gordon Brown insisted at the time that not he but the Scottish government had taken the decision to release Megrahi, and he "respected" the Scottish ministers right to do so, a phrase that was taken as an endorsement of Megrahi's release.

Last night, Sheinwald issued a statement that made it clear that the coalition government takes a different view.

said: "The new British government is clear Megrahi's release was a mistake. [It] deeply regrets the continuing anguish that his release on compassionate grounds has caused the families of Megrahi's victims in the UK, as well as in the US. However, under UK law, where Scottish justice issues are devolved to Scotland, it fell solely to the Scottish executive to consider Megrahi's case. Under Scottish law, Megrahi was entitled to be considered for release on compassionate grounds. Whilst we disagreed with the decision to release Megrahi, we have to respect the independence of the process. The inquiry by the justice committee of the Scottish parliament concluded in February that the Scottish executive took this decision in good faith, on the basis of the medical evidence available to them at the time, and due process was followed.

"We have to accept that the release licence does not provide a mechanism for a person who has been released on compassionate grounds to be returned to prison if they have survived for longer than the period diagnosed by the relevant medical authorities."

A spokesman for the Scottish executive denied it had any contact with BP before releasing Megrahi. It said it had transferred him purely on compassionate grounds because of his ill health. "We had absolutely no representations from BP. Mr Megrahi … was sent home to die according to the due process of Scots law, based on the medical report of the Scottish Prison Service director of health and care, and the recommendations of the Parole Board and prison governor."

Clinton discussed the issue with the foreign secretary, William Hague, who raised the idea of Britain explaining the circumstances to the US lawmakers, the State Department said.

Claims that Megrahi was released because of an oil deal and that medical evidence supporting his release, was paid for by the Libyan government, were not true, said Sheinwald.

Yesterday, BP acknowledged it pressed the government over the signing of the prisoner transfer agreement with the Gaddafi regime, but insisted it had made no representations about Megrahi's actual release. Megrahi was the only man to be convicted of involvement in the bombing of Pan Am flight 103, which killed 270 people in 1988. He was freed on compassionate grounds after being diagnosed with terminal cancer and given three months to live.

Libya says the guilt of the former intelligence agent has never been proven, although it paid compensation.New York Democrat senators Frank Lautenberg, Kirsten Gillibrand and Charles Schumer and New Jersey Democrat senator Robert Menendez called for an inquiry, after reports that a cancer expert, who backed the three-month prognosis, now believed Megrahi could live for 10 or 20 years.

But yesterday, professor Karol Sikora, medical director of CancerPartners UK, said his words were taken out of context, and that the chances of Megrahi surviving for a decade were "less than 1%".

Sikora said: "There was a greater than 50% chance, in my opinion, that he would die within the first three months then gradually as you go along the chances get less and less.

"So the chances of living 10 years is less than 1%, something like that."

In a letter to Clinton, the senators questioned whether BP was prepared to "trade justice ... for oil profits".


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/ju ... hi-mistake

Britain's actions were shocking and disgusting at the time of the release in 2009. This news is not unexpected.

Inexcusable and absolutely shameful.
User avatar
Texpat
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 1306
Joined: July 21, 2007, 1:43 am

Re: Brit government admits releasing al-Megrahi was a mistak

Postby WBU ALUM » July 17, 2010, 12:57 pm

Not surprising.

It smelled of spoiled fish from the day the news was released.
User avatar
WBU ALUM
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 2051
Joined: July 29, 2008, 11:40 pm
Location: Udon Thani

Re: Brit government admits releasing al-Megrahi was a mistak

Postby nkstan » July 17, 2010, 1:01 pm

Where are our forum liberals on this one?????Probably waiting for Obama to comment,so they cam stay in unison! :lol:
User avatar
nkstan
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 1564
Joined: December 18, 2009, 12:44 pm

Re: Brit government admits releasing al-Megrahi was a mistak

Postby arjay » July 17, 2010, 1:02 pm

Quite a good clear and explanatory article.

Texpat, you like to "throw in" the odd couple of emotive expressions and phrases don't you. No rational thinking or logic behind them, just to stir the pot methinks. A bit of a troll on the quiet eh? [-X

Maybe you should read the article again, slowly and carefully, and then review your comments. In case you don't pick up on the relevant bits, may I draw these to your attention:
A spokesman for the Scottish executive denied it had any contact with BP before releasing Megrahi. It said it had transferred him purely on compassionate grounds because of his ill health. "We had absolutely no representations from BP. Mr Megrahi … was sent home to die according to the due process of Scots law, based on the medical report of the Scottish Prison Service director of health and care, and the recommendations of the Parole Board and prison governor."

He was freed on compassionate grounds after being diagnosed with terminal cancer and given three months to live


I'm sure WBU will respect the independence of the decision making process here (see quote below). No arbitrary decisions made without due process (by the President) here. ;)
However, under UK law, where Scottish justice issues are devolved to Scotland, it fell solely to the Scottish executive to consider Megrahi's case. Under Scottish law, Megrahi was entitled to be considered for release on compassionate grounds. Whilst we disagreed with the decision to release Megrahi, we have to respect the independence of the process. The inquiry by the justice committee of the Scottish parliament concluded in February that the Scottish executive took this decision in good faith, on the basis of the medical evidence available to them at the time, and due process was followed.
User avatar
arjay
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 8352
Joined: October 2, 2005, 12:19 pm
Location: Gone to get a life, "troll free"

Re: Brit government admits releasing al-Megrahi was a mistak

Postby Texpat » July 17, 2010, 1:16 pm

What makes you think I don't understand your highlighted relevant bits?

Releasing a convicted terrorist and murderer of 100s on humanitarian grounds is precisely what I find repulsive, shocking, shameful and inexcusable.

The fact that the killer has outlived his "two months" and that BP weasels were probably in the mix -- are merely maggots on the festering turd.
User avatar
Texpat
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 1306
Joined: July 21, 2007, 1:43 am

Re: Brit government admits releasing al-Megrahi was a mistak

Postby cookie » July 17, 2010, 1:36 pm

and arjay is living in his dreamworld again:

The new details demonstrate that BP was willing to risk international security for pure profit motives.

BP will begin deepwater drilling in Libya next month, a deal potentially worth $20 billion. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$

This shows again how companies will put profits and business opportunity ahead of justice.
Our capitalist system is broken
Too big to fail companies are controlling the Government.
The Governments no longer serve the people, they serve the few greedy ones.... :evil: :evil: :evil:


BP admitted that officials had lobbied the British government in 2007 to “conclude a prisoner-transfer agreement that the Libyan government wanted to secure the release of the only person ever convicted for the 1988 Lockerbie airliner bombing over Scotland, which killed 270 people, 189 of them Americans.” BP was “worried that a stalemate on that front would undercut an oil exploration deal with Libya.”

how many links do you need???

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/7892770/US-senators-demand-BP-records-on-Libya-lobbying.html

BP issued a statement confirming it had spoken to government in 2007 about the "slow progress" being made in negotiating a prisoner transfer agreement with Libya.


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/16/world/europe/16britain.html?_r=1

The oil giant BP faced a new furor on Thursday as it confirmed that it had lobbied the British government to conclude a prisoner-transfer agreement that the Libyan government wanted to secure the release of the only person ever convicted for the 1988 Lockerbie airliner bombing over Scotland, which killed 270 people, 189 of them Americans.



http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/07/15/MNM21EF4FD.DTL

The UK justice minister at the time, Jack Straw, had admitted that the BP-Libya deal was a factor in the government’s review of Al-Megrahi’s case.

Oil giant BP faced a new furor Thursday as it confirmed that it had lobbied the British government to conclude a prisoner-transfer agreement that the Libyan government wanted to secure the release of the only person convicted for the 1988 Lockerbie airliner bombing over Scotland, which killed 270 people, most of them Americans.



and of course all of this happened under Obama’s watch considering his close ties with BP, isn't it.....
perhaps Obama should send these BP managers to Guantanamo,
they clearly have connections with terrorists,
unlawful combatants....isn't it ;) ;)
User avatar
cookie
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 2433
Joined: September 29, 2006, 8:52 pm

Re: Brit government admits releasing al-Megrahi was a mistak

Postby Eazy-Going » July 17, 2010, 4:27 pm

Texpat wrote:
Britain's actions were shocking and disgusting at the time of the release in 2009. This news is not unexpected.

Inexcusable and absolutely shameful.


Not Britains actions Texpat, the Sottish Govt and endorsed by that first class p**ck of a Prime Minister we had at the...also Scottish may I add. I think I can honestly say that many of the English public, (if you can find them living in England now), where also appalled with the decision at the time and definately all of my friends and associates would've liked to see him rot in jail without any pain relief for his illness...
User avatar
Eazy-Going
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 101
Joined: March 15, 2010, 11:46 am
Location: UTH

Re: Brit government admits releasing al-Megrahi was a mistak

Postby jackspratt » July 17, 2010, 4:38 pm

Eazy-Going wrote:............ and definately all of my friends and associates would've liked to see him rot in jail without any pain relief for his illness...


But we are better than them, aren't we.....................? :roll:
User avatar
jackspratt
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 6125
Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm
Location: Ban Dung

Re: Brit government admits releasing al-Megrahi was a mistak

Postby Eazy-Going » July 17, 2010, 4:42 pm

Very succinct Jack, on reflection...yes we are, and when you lower yourselves to their standards then you become just as bad.
User avatar
Eazy-Going
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 101
Joined: March 15, 2010, 11:46 am
Location: UTH

Re: Brit government admits releasing al-Megrahi was a mistak

Postby cookie » July 17, 2010, 4:46 pm

“BP received a new round of scrutiny yesterday when it admitted that officials had lobbied the British government in 2007…”

Hmmm, 2007… Who was our president then???

Oh come now!
That’s all you got?
“It happened on PRESIDENT Obama’s watch, so it is entirely his fault.
Wahhhh wahhhh wahhhh!”
he had 18 months time to do something about it
we should impeach him of course.....
User avatar
cookie
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 2433
Joined: September 29, 2006, 8:52 pm


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    Views
    Author

Return to World News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

  • Advertisement