I am amazed at some of the responses!
Although Jeremy is asking about whether a 4 yr.old should be punished and what punishment would be appropiate,if any,most seem to be focused on whether or not the judge should have ruled the way he did!!
Since the incident was supervised by the attending parents,the child would be totally ignorant of the right or wrong of his actions!Why would any ''negative'' actions be taken against child?If anything ,the child should be consoled by the parents as they explain that they made a mistake,not the child!
As far as the judges ruling,allowing the suit to go forward,he is right,following the precedents already in place!It is not his job to change laws that are on the books,whether he agrees or not.We have higher courts that have that job!
