Jackspratt's Avatar

jackspratt wrote:

ears'n'eye's wrote:

Billg wrote:How about another Poll along the same lines

get rid of "Jacks Prat" and keep the Avatar


billg

Ill vote for that.

Actually, you may find the voting procedure a bit complicated.

i did 'not find it hard, yes i did change my mind and vote i thought that i made comments so i should vote.

jackspratt wrote:ph you are not trying to drag your own thread off topic are you?

BTW, if you look at my avatar from the back of your monitor, you may get a pleasant surprise.

i feel that there is something very fish'y about mr spratt and his avatar, can't quiet put a 'finger licking good' fish finger on it. sorry about the lesson in American mannerisms. just a few let you all down

don't bother with your usual comment mr spratt as i used American spell check too.

old-timer wrote:Three things, firstly - there is nothing wrong with showing off a well fit bird, secondly - if I'm in the internet cafe looking at one of JS posts everyone thinks I'm a pervert, and last, I liked the Avatar movie which has nothing to do with anything, I know.

OT.............Voted that the JS avatar should stay........

how are you so sure it is not a ladyboy bird butt OT by experience i might guess? i suppose i should ask Mr spratt that.

Billg wrote:Jacks PRATT, keep your avatar it reflects what you are .... A Perfect Ass

Cheers
Bill

may be mr jack spratt should change his name to mr jack ass can we have a vote on it Arjay? allso most people here know that you can have manny alias's on this site which would put result into dispute i think. thought i'd say it now rather than have a cry of sour grapes later

jackspratt wrote:Mainer I think you will find this discussion has been held before on UM.

At the time I offered to remove the avatar if:

- the Mods requested it, or

- there was strong objection from a number of forum members.

Neither occurred (in fact, just the opposite from members), so the avatar remains.

It is unfortunate if you, or others in your presence find it offensive. However, this is a forum for grown-ups.

I've tried my best to promote your big day on stage but as you can clearly see by views: Mr S Slade (slimey v Mr .pratt) is by far a bigger b..... ratbag than yopu could ever be.

I think "eyes and ears" villification of Jackspratt has gone a bit too far - and also way off topic. I think "eyes and ears" needs to find a productive hobby.

Ronan01 wrote:I think "eyes and ears" villification of Jackspratt has gone a bit too far - and also way off topic. I think "eyes and ears" needs to find a productive hobby.

Yes, agreed Ronan.

Ears and eyes, - enough. Your remarks are getting too personal. Please ensure your posts are constructive and on topic.

We don't want any of Obama's language on here!

Thanks

UMSTB

Oh for Heaven sake let him vent his Spleen, I'm sure Jack get's a good giggle over his morning Coffee so why spoil it for him

ears'n'eye's wrote:how are you so sure it is not a ladyboy bird butt OT?

OT's not so sure about quite a few things, however on this occasion I'm sure it's a WFB's backside.
I've got something like that wrong before though.


OT........

arjay wrote:

Ronan01 wrote:I think "eyes and ears" villification of Jackspratt has gone a bit too far - and also way off topic. I think "eyes and ears" needs to find a productive hobby.

Yes, agreed Ronan.

Ears and eyes, - enough. Your remarks are getting too personal. Please ensure your posts are constructive and on topic.

We don't want any of Obama's language on here!

Thanks

UMSTB

Thanks for the complement? i think you may be thinking of the tiger wood thing.

ronan01 wrote:I think "eyes and ears" villification of Jackspratt has gone a bit too far - and also way off topic. I think "eyes and ears" needs to find a productive hobby.

what like sexist avatars

arjay wrote:

Ronan01 wrote:I think "eyes and ears" villification of Jackspratt has gone a bit too far - and also way off topic. I think "eyes and ears" needs to find a productive hobby.

Yes, agreed Ronan.

Ears and eyes, - enough. Your remarks are getting too personal. Please ensure your posts are constructive and on topic.

We don't want any of Obama's language on here!

Thanks

UMSTB

obiously the suffergets have not arrived in Thailand yet

arjay wrote:

Ronan01 wrote:I think "eyes and ears" villification of Jackspratt has gone a bit too far - and also way off topic. I think "eyes and ears" needs to find a productive hobby.

Yes, agreed Ronan.

Ears and eyes, - enough. Your remarks are getting too personal. Please ensure your posts are constructive and on topic.

We don't want any of Obama's language on here!

Thanks

UMSTB

what hobby would you sugest being a pervert? then i can really join you oh no

If the avatar's offend then, as I have already quite carefully explained, they can be turned off. Simple and efficient & so should be of no offence or issue to anyone.
Personal insults directed at ANY member are, in my opinion (& the opinion of the Forum Rules) completely inappropriate & unnecessary. A need to resort to personal abusive language is never justifiable even over matters of high importance - simply because it shows that the user has already lost the argument. To resort to abuse over something as mudane and unimportant as avatars is, to be honest, quite bewildering, especially given that all users have the solution in their own hands...