Udon Thani Forum
Facebook twitter Youtube Rss
Udon Country Club

  • Advertisement

The vilification of BP (by Obama) due to oil well leak

General off-topic debates and discussions forum.

Re: Resolving the BP oil spill - related news

Postby cookie » July 24, 2010, 10:56 am

and yet more alarming testimonies in front of the Congress !!!!!




Deepwater Horizon Alarm System Was Partly Disabled Prior To Explosion, Technician Tells Congress



it looks that criminal investigations are necessary now :evil: :evil: :evil:


An alarm system was partially shut down the day the ill-fated oil rig Deepwater Horizon exploded in the Gulf of Mexico, killing 11 workers and setting off the massive spill, an electronics technician who was aboard told an investigative panel on Friday.



Technician Mike Williams told the panel that the alarm system was turned on to monitor for fire, explosive gas and toxic gas but that its sound and light alarms had been disabled.


Williams testified that he had asked before about the settings and was told the company didn't want a false alarm waking people at night.

Williams said that if the system had been fully active, an alarm likely would have sounded before the explosion, which happened on the night of April 20.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/23/deepwater-horizon-alarm-s_n_657143.html

:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
User avatar
cookie
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 2430
Joined: September 29, 2006, 8:52 pm

Re: Resolving the BP oil spill - related news

Postby jackspratt » July 24, 2010, 11:29 am

I note that the report from the Huff Post does not mention which of the relevant companies is "the company" in respect to fiddling with the alarm.

I also note from another report (http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010 ... ion=justin) that the technician, Mike Williams, has filed a lawsuit against the rig manager, Transocean (a Swiss company). Perhaps this gives us a clue as to my first paragraph.
User avatar
jackspratt
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 5863
Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm
Location: Ban Dung

Re: Resolving the BP oil spill - related news

Postby cookie » July 24, 2010, 11:52 am

Jack, this article is even more alarming:

At this week's hearings, Transocean officials recited a litany of mechanical problems that plagued the rig, which was 43 days behind schedule in drilling the Macondo well, which rig workers referred to as the "well from hell".

Mr Williams, who has filed a lawsuit against Transocean, said a computer system that monitored well drilling operations, known as the "A chair," was often offline due to technical issues.

"We called it the blue screen of death," he said.

"It would turn blue and you would have no data coming through."


and on the other rigs ????? :-# :-# :-# :-# :-# :-#
User avatar
cookie
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 2430
Joined: September 29, 2006, 8:52 pm

Re: The vilification of BP (by Obama) due to oil well leak

Postby arjay » July 25, 2010, 2:32 pm

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/busin ... 34667.html

An article from the Independent newspaper (UK) about the future of BP CEO Tony Hayward. Note the reference to BP's Chairman and Obama, (in the extract quoted below):
BP board to decide on Hayward
However, a BP spokesman said that a decision would be taken at tomorrow's board meeting to sign off the results. But he added: "Tony has the full backing of the board and there is no plan for his departure at this stage." But sources said Mr Hayward has offered to resign – or at least announce a co-ordinated departure – if the board felt it was in the best interests of the company after the public outrage over the oil spill and the media blitz on his position. The board is also said to be considering other alternatives, including bringing in outsiders.

But BP's senior executives and staff argue that it is not Mr Hayward who should fall on his sword but Carl-Henric Svanberg, the Swedish chairman, who was notable for his absence in the first weeks after the disaster.


They maintain it was Mr Svanberg's lack of leadership that allowed the crisis to turn into a catastrophe, whipped up by US President Barack Obama. One alternative is to replace Mr Svanberg with Paul Anderson, a BP non-executive who had been tipped for the top job in the past.

BP is forecast to report interim profits of £5bn but will also give details of provisions set aside to cover clearing up the oil spill, to be funded by asset sales which could raise up to £10bn. The final cost could be as much as $50bn
User avatar
arjay
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 8294
Joined: October 2, 2005, 12:19 pm
Location: Gone to get a life, "troll free"

Re: The vilification of BP (by Obama) due to oil well leak

Postby UdonExpat » July 25, 2010, 4:51 pm

Ah, it does the heart good to know that President Obama was effective in vilifying the villians. =D>
User avatar
UdonExpat
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 1271
Joined: June 9, 2007, 10:30 am
Location: 3rd rock from the sun

Re: The vilification of BP (by Obama) due to oil well leak

Postby cookie » July 26, 2010, 11:44 am

=D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
very effective indeed
=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
User avatar
cookie
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 2430
Joined: September 29, 2006, 8:52 pm

Re: The vilification of BP (by Obama) due to oil well leak

Postby arjay » July 26, 2010, 1:03 pm

Yes, Tony Hayward (the villain???) is probably going to be standing down today, prior to the BP AGM, because of his PR gaffs & lack of PR skills, Obama's vilification of him and the fact that most of the US detest him or what he represents. ;) Notwithstanding the fact that he hasn't (yet) been found guilty of any offences in a court of law, or that he had a long and illustrious career as an oil man, though clearly not as a PR man.

I wonder if he'll take up any further "Senate invitations"! :-k

Let's hope his successor can handle those aspects better! :D
User avatar
arjay
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 8294
Joined: October 2, 2005, 12:19 pm
Location: Gone to get a life, "troll free"

Re: The vilification of BP (by Obama) due to oil well leak

Postby cookie » July 26, 2010, 1:26 pm

yep,
let's hope he got his life back.... he asked for it......
User avatar
cookie
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 2430
Joined: September 29, 2006, 8:52 pm

Re: The vilification of BP (by Obama) due to oil well leak

Postby BobHelm » July 26, 2010, 3:01 pm

It was always on the cards that he would go once the inital 'crisis' was over & the financial papers predicted this a few weeks ago. The only decision is to how much his pay off will be. There are strong rumors that his contract demands that he is paid the full extent of it, but his total payment package last year was about £4.5M although only £1.5 of that was actual basic salary, so a few things to discuss.
The thing not up for discussion is that he will start to get £0.5M pension a year as soon as he goes. He has been at BP a fair old time, though not long as CEO.
The oil experts on television last night all agreed that he would/could get a senior position with any of the 'second tier' oil companies tomorrow as he is still well respected for his technical knowledge within the industry.
Where he is, obviously, not an expert is his media ability & I imagine he will take up a 'backroom' position somewhere within the industry.
User avatar
BobHelm
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 10541
Joined: September 7, 2005, 11:58 pm
Location: Udon Thani

Re: The vilification of BP (by Obama) due to oil well leak

Postby Texpat » July 26, 2010, 3:13 pm

There was no personal or national vendetta. The CEO of any company that created such a environmental catastrophe would have met the same fate. Perhaps Haywards next company won't be so flippant and careless about safety.
User avatar
Texpat
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 1306
Joined: July 21, 2007, 1:43 am

Re: The vilification of BP (by Obama) due to oil well leak

Postby jackspratt » July 26, 2010, 3:31 pm

Texpat wrote:There was no personal or national vendetta. The CEO of any company that created such a environmental catastrophe would have met the same fate. Perhaps Haywards next company won't be so flippant and careless about safety.


Exactly!

Unless they were an American of course.

Lawrence G. Rawl (May 4, 1928 - February 14, 2005) was the Chairman and CEO of Exxon from 1985 to 1993.

By 1980, he was named a senior vice president and director of Exxon Corporation. In 1985, he was named president of the corporation; and in 1987, he became chairman and CEO. During his tenure as head of Exxon, he moved the corporate headquarters from New York to Irving, Texas, increased reserves, and expanded the chemical operations of the corporation.

He was at the helm of the company when the Exxon Valdez oil spill went occured in 1989. He faced criticism for his response to the oil spill — his slow public response and demeanor in interviews were noted and the focus of criticism of the company.

Rawl retired from Exxon in 1993 at the mandatory retirement age of 65 after 41 years with the company.......


:shock: :D :D :D

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_G._Rawl
User avatar
jackspratt
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 5863
Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm
Location: Ban Dung

Re: The vilification of BP (by Obama) due to oil well leak

Postby BobHelm » July 26, 2010, 3:41 pm

Ah, that is just good old 'no facts Tex' again Jack. Never lets a thing like a fact or the truth interfere with his xenophobic views!! :D :D
User avatar
BobHelm
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 10541
Joined: September 7, 2005, 11:58 pm
Location: Udon Thani

Re: The vilification of BP (by Obama) due to oil well leak

Postby arjay » July 26, 2010, 3:53 pm

Ahh, but Jack and Bob, you're missing a couple of important points there. ;)

Lawrence G Rawl is American, as is Exxon Mobil, as is Texpat and I think Obama :-" , but Tony Hayward and BP are British. :-"
User avatar
arjay
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 8294
Joined: October 2, 2005, 12:19 pm
Location: Gone to get a life, "troll free"

Re: The vilification of BP (by Obama) due to oil well leak

Postby jackspratt » July 26, 2010, 4:08 pm

jackspratt wrote:
Texpat wrote:There was no personal or national vendetta. The CEO of any company that created such a environmental catastrophe would have met the same fate. Perhaps Haywards next company won't be so flippant and careless about safety.


Exactly!

Unless they were an American of course.

Lawrence G. Rawl (May 4, 1928 - February 14, 2005) was the Chairman and CEO of Exxon from 1985 to 1993.

By 1980, he was named a senior vice president and director of Exxon Corporation. In 1985, he was named president of the corporation; and in 1987, he became chairman and CEO. During his tenure as head of Exxon, he moved the corporate headquarters from New York to Irving, Texas, increased reserves, and expanded the chemical operations of the corporation.

He was at the helm of the company when the Exxon Valdez oil spill went occured in 1989. He faced criticism for his response to the oil spill — his slow public response and demeanor in interviews were noted and the focus of criticism of the company.

Rawl retired from Exxon in 1993 at the mandatory retirement age of 65 after 41 years with the company.......


:shock: :D :D :D

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_G._Rawl


Or, of course, who could ever forget Bhopal.

Warren M. Anderson (born 1921) is a former chairman and chief executive officer of Union Carbide. He held these posts during the Bhopal disaster in 1984, in which more than 20,000 people died and thousands more were injured. The disaster took place in a plant belonging to an Indian subsidiary, Union Carbide India Limited, in the city of Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Anderson was born in 1921 in the Bay Ridge section of Brooklyn, New York,...............

As the Union Carbide CEO at the time of the disaster, Anderson was charged with manslaughter in the Bhopal disaster case. Anderson returned to the US after being arrested and has refused to return to India. He was declared a fugitive from justice by the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bhopal on February 1, 1992, for failing to appear at the court hearings in a culpable homicide case in which he was named the chief defendant. The chief judicial magistrate of Bhopal, Prakash Mohan Tiwari, issued an arrest warrant for Anderson on July 31, 2009. The United States has declined to extradite him, citing a lack of evidence.

In August 2009, a spokesman for Union Carbide said "Union Carbide had no role in operating the plant at the time as the factory was owned, managed and operated by employees of Union Carbide India Limited." Eight former senior employees of this subsidiary were found guilty on June 7, 2010. After these convictions, a Union Carbide spokesperson said, "All the appropriate people from UCIL -- officers and those who actually ran the plant on a daily basis -- have appeared to face charges."


:shock:

As an aside. I wonder what would have been the response had the Indian cabinet "invited" the US Attorney General of the time to appear in India to explain himself, and the reasons for not extraditing Anderson?
User avatar
jackspratt
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 5863
Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm
Location: Ban Dung

Re: The vilification of BP (by Obama) due to oil well leak

Postby arjay » July 26, 2010, 4:15 pm

As the Union Carbide CEO at the time of the disaster, Anderson was charged with manslaughter in the Bhopal disaster case. Anderson returned to the US after being arrested and has refused to return to India. He was declared a fugitive from justice by the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bhopal on February 1, 1992, for failing to appear at the court hearings in a culpable homicide case in which he was named the chief defendant. The chief judicial magistrate of Bhopal, Prakash Mohan Tiwari, issued an arrest warrant for Anderson on July 31, 2009. The United States has declined to extradite him, citing a lack of evidence.

Yes, he clearly had a few "invitations" that he never took up, and his were from a Court not just a Senatorial circus!! :-s

What nationality was Anderson then? :-k

Is he still in his job then?
User avatar
arjay
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 8294
Joined: October 2, 2005, 12:19 pm
Location: Gone to get a life, "troll free"

PreviousNext

  • Similar topics
    Replies
    Views
    Author

Return to General Debates & Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

  • Advertisement