"A welcome update "
Unfortunately, the seed has been planted. A lot of people don't have the brain capacity to absorb the absolution.
![]() |
![]() |
rick wrote:Moral of the Wikileaks and rape allegations - Careful if you want to F**K the government, because as they feel violated, they may cry RAPE - only needs one minion to do that.

FrazeeDK wrote:no, because there's still a molestation charge out on him that doesn't mandate an arrest warrant.. If he violated Swedish law when visiting then I imagine he'll be either arrested or served with a subpoena when (if) he returns to the country.. If the U.S. wants him, then a U.S. Attorney's office should file charges of esponage against Assange.. Then U.S. authorities could either file for extradition or snatch him any time he's either in U.S. terrritory or in international waters..
1 September 2010 Last updated at 10:00 GMT
Sweden Reopens Wikileaks Founder Rape Investigation
A senior Swedish prosecutor has ordered the reopening of a rape investigation into Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.
Public Prosecutions Director Marianne Ny said there was "reason to believe a crime has been committed" and the crime was classified as rape.
Last week prosecutors cancelled an arrest warrant for Mr Assange on accusations of rape and molestation, saying he was no longer suspected.
Mr Assange denies any wrongdoing saying the accusations are "without basis".
When the allegations first emerged, he said their appearance at a time when Wikileaks had been criticised for leaking Afghan war documents was "deeply disturbing".
In July, Wikileaks published more than 75,000 secret US military documents on the war in Afghanistan.
US authorities criticised the leak, saying it could put the lives of coalition soldiers and Afghans, especially informers, at risk.
The decision to reopen the case follows an appeal by a Swedish woman who has accused Mr Assange of raping her.
*
(09-04) 18:21 PDT San Francisco -- After years of mounting public pressure, Craigslist appears to have surrendered a battle over sexual ads on its website that some viewed as a test case for the boundaries of online freedom.
The popular San Francisco classifieds site removed its controversial adult services section late Friday, defiantly replacing the link with the word "censored."
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... z0ycxAgZ3t
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests