We use steel frying pans and steel pots to cook and we use steel for heaters, both items using naked flame against steel. What type of heat , no matter how ferocious the fires were reputed to be, could be so intense, as to heat the steel beams which of course are much more thicker than cooking pans, and to heat them so intensly, that these huge steel beams all melted symultaniously and collapsed the 3 buildings at the WTC in a manner similar to controlled demolitions? Strange that there have been much more intense fires all over the world burning on all floors for over 24 hours and in all occasions the steel beams hardly buckled and in all occasions the structure of the buildings remained in tact. Only 3 high rise steel framed buildings have ever reputedly collapsed because of fire. Strange that these 3 buildings that supposedly collapsed because of fire all happened on the same day.
So here we have another rediculous explanation similar to the hundreds of other 9/11 rediculous "coincidences" we are supposed to swallow , believe and shut up about. The fact the official version of events turn physics as we know it on its head, don't stop gullible people believing in the official scientifically impossible "pancake" explanation.
Compare the pictures of the WTC7 fires to the High Rise Beijing fire of last year:
This building did not collapse, in fact
NO steel framed high rise building has ever collapsed because of fire but Bush and Co resisted any inquiry into 9/11 for 411 days because "they already knew what happened on 9/11" - now that I believe!
Think about it, 3 high rise steel framed buildings collapse in a similar manner to controlled demolitions, but the Bush administration fought very hard to have no inquiry whatsover and only relented due to pressure from the victims families.
Ask yourself, if you are a free thinker and not someone who believes only what you are told to believe, what are we to understand globally of the performance of protected steel framed building high rise structures in fire situations? There has been over a hundred examples world-wide, and now the Beijing fire suggest the high rise steel framed buildings perform well, are robust and do not suffer global collapse. Structurally they survive.
In contrast, three high rise structures collapsed due to fire on 9/11/01. WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 collapsed due to fires generating a fraction of the heat occurring in the Beijing fire. WTC7 in particular collapsed at virtual free-fall speed into its own footprint although it was not struck by any aircraft. How do you really think this happened?
Are we supposed to ignore the hundreds of witnesses who experienced and heard explosions and what sounded like bombs going off prior to all 3 building collapses?
Two points come up quickly for me:Does a claim of ''alleged'' behavior,constitute a guilty as charged indictment by you?
