Now What? (American Politics)

World news discussion forum
Post Reply
User avatar
jackspratt
udonmap.com
Posts: 16085
Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by jackspratt » February 18, 2012, 6:05 pm

Ricohoc wrote: For those unfamiliar with abortion law in the US, gestation age must be determined, since it illegal to abort beyond a certain period of time.
If that is the case, how has gestation age been determined in the many years preceding this new legislation?

Has it involved invasive body penetration?



User avatar
merchant seaman
udonmap.com
Posts: 2221
Joined: November 13, 2005, 2:58 pm
Location: looking out my backdoor

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by merchant seaman » February 18, 2012, 6:25 pm

Sure glad I live in Thailand. Retired, money in the bank, and a pension. Could really care less about Republicans or Democrats, they sure as hell don't care about you and me. Please someone, even khondahm, explain to me why someone spends millions and millions to get a job that pays, what is it now? 300,000 a year. Democrate, Republican belief who you want they are all in it for the money and the power, bottom line. If they were patriotic they would join the military.

Ricohoc
udonmap.com
Posts: 1718
Joined: February 8, 2007, 5:37 am

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by Ricohoc » February 18, 2012, 6:36 pm

jackspratt wrote:
Ricohoc wrote: For those unfamiliar with abortion law in the US, gestation age must be determined, since it illegal to abort beyond a certain period of time.
If that is the case, how has gestation age been determined in the many years preceding this new legislation?

Has it involved invasive body penetration?
Got no idea, jack, and I couldn't care less. I'm only providing facts, not MSNBC propaganda.

My issue is an over-reaching elitist big government -- federal or state -- regardless of party or situation when it violates individual liberty.

You see, this is the kind of crap that occurs when government gets involved and tax revenue is used. It is the federal courts that made abortion legal and did not allow states to determine their own abortion laws. It opens the door for all types of intrusiveness. This is just another example.

I will add this: What the Commonwealth of Virginia does is between them and Virginia's citizens. This law doesn't affect all US citizens, and I'm not even sure what citizens of Virginia it will affect. All states have the authority to enact legislation within their borders (see the 9th and 10th Amendments). That said, I am still against any over-reach that violates individual sovereignty/liberty.

User avatar
KHONDAHM
udonmap.com
Posts: 2428
Joined: November 15, 2009, 3:07 pm

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by KHONDAHM » February 18, 2012, 6:40 pm

Ricohoc wrote:As usual, certain individuals leave out important components in their political claims. This contraception issue and the changing of the topic to Virginia's ultrasound law is no different.

Here is a link to the official legislation: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504 ... +sum+SB484

Here is the reason for the legislation:
to determine gestation age
.

For those unfamiliar with abortion law in the US, gestation age must be determined, since it illegal to abort beyond a certain period of time.
First, it would be nice if your link worked. Of course - it doesn't. Surprise. Surprise.

Second, the legislation is representative of Republicans' hypocrisy on the issue of intrusive government. What could possibly be more exemplary than the hand of Virginia's Republican government shoving a probe up a woman's vagina - against her will (!!!)? The "reason" does not matter. If it is medically unnecessary and against her will, then it's blatant legislated R-A-P-E.

I am sure a case will make it to SCOTUS and the law struck down as unconstitutional followed by a whole lot of civil suits.
Enjoy this site much more by adding idiots to your ignore list (Friends & Foes tab).
http:\\www.udonmap.com/udonthaniforum/ucp.php? ... &mode=foes

Ricohoc
udonmap.com
Posts: 1718
Joined: February 8, 2007, 5:37 am

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by Ricohoc » February 18, 2012, 6:51 pm

First, the link works fine for me. I just went there again.

Second, I am not a Republican, and I have great disdain for most of them. Republicans are part of big government. Conservatives and Republicans are not the same thing. Conservatives are consistent in their fight against torment and tyranny.

Big government is bad, KD, regardless of the name of the tyrant.

User avatar
KHONDAHM
udonmap.com
Posts: 2428
Joined: November 15, 2009, 3:07 pm

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by KHONDAHM » February 18, 2012, 6:55 pm

merchant seaman wrote:...explain to me why someone spends millions and millions to get a job that pays, what is it now? 300,000 a year...
...or why someone who is already incredibly wealthy would want to be a public servant...

I continue to contemplate the same question as I have since the first time I discovered decades ago how much personal wealth these politicians have. I could only guess that for many, it would be to obtain information or knowledge to make them or those who support them wealthier and/or more influential (influence = true power). There are some, Joe Biden and Barack Obama, for example, who have a record of public service, shunning special interests, encouraging community involvement, and advocating individual participation. I can find many non-Republican examples, but I can't find any current Republicans as examples. I would appreciate if anyone could offer some up (Federal level)...
Enjoy this site much more by adding idiots to your ignore list (Friends & Foes tab).
http:\\www.udonmap.com/udonthaniforum/ucp.php? ... &mode=foes

Ricohoc
udonmap.com
Posts: 1718
Joined: February 8, 2007, 5:37 am

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by Ricohoc » February 18, 2012, 6:59 pm

KHONDAHM wrote:I am sure a case will make it to SCOTUS and the law struck down as unconstitutional followed by a whole lot of civil suits.
You do realize that if this makes it to the SCOTUS, they will have to deal with this Virginia law and ObamaCare in the same light. Both are big government mandates. They can't favor one and not the other. They are both government intrusion into private decisions about health care.

You should also realize that this could all be a ploy by Republicans in Virginia, whose state is involved in the lawsuit AGAINST ObamaCare. This may have been enacted purposely to just show more gross over-reach by government and place members of the SCOTUS in a situaton where they cannot pick and choose.

Just another example of what is wrong IS WRONG -- no matter the name of the tyrant.

kjellsnell
udonmap.com
Posts: 575
Joined: October 18, 2009, 2:38 pm

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by kjellsnell » February 18, 2012, 7:02 pm

I don't think the common reader of this forum find the politic situation in America interesting....
These days life seems pretty good and I eagerly look forward to the continuation!

Ricohoc
udonmap.com
Posts: 1718
Joined: February 8, 2007, 5:37 am

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by Ricohoc » February 18, 2012, 7:05 pm

kjellsnell wrote:I don't think the common reader of this forum find the politic situation in America interesting....
True. We need to talk about the renaming of soccer stadiums! Now THAT is interesting! :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
KHONDAHM
udonmap.com
Posts: 2428
Joined: November 15, 2009, 3:07 pm

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by KHONDAHM » February 18, 2012, 7:10 pm

Ricohoc wrote:Conservatives are consistent in their fight against torment and tyranny.
This part, my dear friend, you may want to retract. No, really. You're stepping into a whole pile of historical sht with that statement and you may want to not go there...just fair warning.
Enjoy this site much more by adding idiots to your ignore list (Friends & Foes tab).
http:\\www.udonmap.com/udonthaniforum/ucp.php? ... &mode=foes

User avatar
Khun Paul
udonmap.com
Posts: 7743
Joined: September 16, 2008, 3:28 pm
Location: Udon Thani

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by Khun Paul » February 18, 2012, 8:13 pm

While I amy not in some cases research all the aspects of American Law nor do I research all aspects of American Voring law, what does surprise me is that for a nation of seemingly intelligent people, the law makers or even those who seek to be a representative of the people ( like president/ senators or even congressmen/women ) spend inordinate amounts of money to sway public opinion behind them and in so doing seek sponsors to which they must ulimately repay in some way or another.
Are the people that stupid or is it that over the years the electorate have become so blase about their politicians that unless a politician spends vast amounts no-one will listen to him/her.

When I dallied in politics in the UK, I was allowed to spend only a certain amount, had I spent more ( that included everything even sponsorship ) I would have been declared illegal and even if I won I would lose. That does make one think hard about what you spend your money on .

Now I am not saying that in the Uk the politicians are any better than their American cousins, but we do spend far less money . From my personal perspective it would appear that the Americans get who ever it is that can spend the money, which is not to my mind the best way.

But then I am English and although we cannot vote for our head of stae for the last 60 odd years she has done a fine job, better than ,most American presidents I think. Damn sight cheaper too !!!!!

User avatar
rick
udonmap.com
Posts: 3238
Joined: January 9, 2008, 10:36 am
Location: Udon, or UK May-August

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by rick » February 18, 2012, 8:31 pm

Ricohoc wrote:
Conservatives are consistent in their fight against torment and tyranny.
Consistent: Right. In supporting tyranny as long as it was anti-communist (ask most residents of South and Central America; from Chile to El Salvador).

Ricohoc
udonmap.com
Posts: 1718
Joined: February 8, 2007, 5:37 am

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by Ricohoc » February 18, 2012, 8:40 pm

rick wrote:
Ricohoc wrote:
Conservatives are consistent in their fight against torment and tyranny.
Consistent: Right. In supporting tyranny as long as it was anti-communist (ask most residents of South and Central America; from Chile to El Salvador).
I'm not talking about the ones who are "conservative" like KD is "independent" -- those who just call themselves that, but don't act it.

I don't even know to whom you are referring, but Conservatives are not necessarily Republicans, rick.

Big government and tyranny is bad no matter the name of the tyrant.

User avatar
BobHelm
udonmap.com
Posts: 18411
Joined: September 7, 2005, 11:58 pm
Location: Udon Thani

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by BobHelm » February 18, 2012, 8:55 pm

Ricohoc wrote:Some text removed.... but Conservatives are not necessarily Republicans, rick.
If you want to be pedantic, Ricohoc, which I know that you often like to be... :D

Conservatives, with a capitalised first letter in mid sentence, can rarely be Republicans.
While it can, I understand, refer to Conservative Jew or Conservative Judaism & hence from that route possibly be a Republican, its main use is as a member of the Conservative Party of Great Britain & so highly unlikely to be Republican, indeed I believe that the rules of the party would prevent that being allowed...

If you mean conservative, with a small initial letter that is a different matter...

Ricohoc
udonmap.com
Posts: 1718
Joined: February 8, 2007, 5:37 am

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by Ricohoc » February 18, 2012, 9:29 pm

I wondered when you'd be here to criticize, Bob. Knew it wouldn't take too long. Now all the usual suspects are here.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

I will be specific again. I know I've said this before over the years, but the same folks forget. Conservatives do not have a political party in America.

Conservatives in America defend the Constitution, promote free enterprise and nurture individual liberty. Those three main tenets of the Founders covers everything. Anyone who is not consistent in those areas is not a real Conservative.

User avatar
BobHelm
udonmap.com
Posts: 18411
Joined: September 7, 2005, 11:58 pm
Location: Udon Thani

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by BobHelm » February 18, 2012, 9:54 pm

No criticism Ricohoc , just a desire for accuracy.

You do not have a monopoly on that...
The use of the final 'Conservative' in your last post is as inaccurate as, in your eyes, anyone who calls America a democracy. You can't pick & chose the truth, as much as you would like to.... :D

User avatar
KHONDAHM
udonmap.com
Posts: 2428
Joined: November 15, 2009, 3:07 pm

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by KHONDAHM » February 18, 2012, 11:30 pm

Conservatives and Conservatism are absolutely associated with the Republicans in American politics. Sorry, but you do not get to choose your own reality.
Enjoy this site much more by adding idiots to your ignore list (Friends & Foes tab).
http:\\www.udonmap.com/udonthaniforum/ucp.php? ... &mode=foes

User avatar
LoveDaBlues
udonmap.com
Posts: 891
Joined: December 30, 2005, 3:06 pm

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by LoveDaBlues » February 19, 2012, 9:55 am

Ricohoc wrote:
LoveDaBlues wrote:Obama was elected because: (1) he got a high percentage of the vote from 'persons of color'
He did get a high percentage of the vote from minorities, but that wasn't why he was elected. Minorities only make up approximately 30% of the entire US population. Blacks and Hispanics are only about 26%. Minorities could not possibly have elected Barack Obama by themselves. White people had to have voted for him in large number for him to have won in 2008.

If he loses in 2012, it won't be because white people suddenly didn't like his skin color. It will be because he has had a record of failure.
McCain WON the white vote; getting 55%. Obama overcame this deficit by garnering 95% of the minority vote.
As long as whites don't vote in such skewed percentages (95% in this case) the minorities will once again elect
Obama as President.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Voter-Group-White (100 votes) 55% vote for Candidate-Mr-White; 45% for Candidate-Mr-Minority

Voter-Group-Minority (20 votes) 90% vote for Candidate-Mr-Minority; 10% Candidate-Mr-White

Candidate-Mr-White gets 57 votes; Candidate-Mr-Minority gets 63 votes This simple example shows
how a minority that votes as a Block can elect a candidate.

I look for the same thing to happen in the next Presidental election.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I never said Obama was elected by the minorities themselves. I said he got a high percentage of the vote from
minorities. This pushed him over the top. Had minorities not voted as a block Obama would have lost; simple as that.

If he loses in 2012, it won't be because white people suddenly didn't like his skin color. It will be because he has had a record of failure.

So ricohoc, since you have the WHY all figured out then complete this: if Obama wins in 2012 it will be because he......

User avatar
merchant seaman
udonmap.com
Posts: 2221
Joined: November 13, 2005, 2:58 pm
Location: looking out my backdoor

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by merchant seaman » February 19, 2012, 10:09 am

Maybe because millions of American's vote for the best looking canidate, according to KD anyway. What other reason could he be elected for, Higher gas prices??

Ricohoc
udonmap.com
Posts: 1718
Joined: February 8, 2007, 5:37 am

Now What? (American Politics)

Post by Ricohoc » February 19, 2012, 10:32 am

LoveDaBlues wrote:If he loses in 2012, it won't be because white people suddenly didn't like his skin color. It will be because he has had a record of failure.

So ricohoc, since you have the WHY all figured out then complete this: if Obama wins in 2012 it will be because he......
... will have convinced people to vote for him.

I can't think of one stance by this administration that the majority of working Americans favor.

Post Reply

Return to “World News”