http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/index.php ... pic=133477
A couple of things flowing from my Visa extension experience at Suan Phlu today.
First, if you haven't had the money in the bank for 3 months they will want to give you a 1-month visa. I changed banks last month (transferred money same day) and they still wanted to give me a 1-month after 2 successive and successful 12m extensions, even though I had all bank books with me for inspection.
Second, you are now required to prove that the 800k came from overseas. Fortunately I had an old certificate from the bank at home otherwise I would have needed to get the bank (which I no longer deal with) to certify a FX transaction from 3 years ago. I imagine that would have been a lot of fun. I was told this new regulation came in today. I was also told nobody had been told in advance. Making it up as they go along I think.
Rich
This post has been edited by RichardEllis: 2007-08-01 22:18:31
My commentary:
The 3 months on deposit was announced in October last year, but many had not heard it. When I went in for my extension in November, they only made my sign a stamp saying that I understood that from then on I would have to have the funds on deposit for 3 months prior to extending. What bothers me is that they gave the guy a hard time about it the fist time he came in for an extension after the rule was announced. If they had done some outreach, then I could understand it -after all, they have the address of all foreigners living in the country, don't they?
Even more disturbing is the new requirement that the 800k be shown as coming from out of the country, and their enforcing it even though this was a new requirement. For some of us, that is either impossible or impractical. In my case, I might have a photo copy of the letter from the bank a few years ago. I really hope this was a misunderstanding. Imagine the plight of somebody who brought in the initial funds 10 or 15 years ago (of course it would have been a lot less).
Having read through the five pages of posts on Thai Visa, I see that several people were surprised late this week when immigration demanded proof that the funds on deposit were from an source outside the country. It is not yet clear to me whether they will be satisfied to see that the original source of funds (such as those used to obtain the original visa) came from outside the country (seems redundant, doesn't it? In that case, I could just make a copy from my file at the immigration office!), or whether they need to see funds coming into the country each year or not. Also there was not resolution to the speculation that immigration may want to see at least 800K being brought in each year (and maybe less for those who obtained visas when the deposit requirements were smaller.)
I don't like the way things are starting to shape up. Soi Suan Pluu had always been the place to go for fair and reasonable treatment. Unhappy One more set of hoops to jump though to keep from being kicked out of our homes.
By the way, this new requirement seems to come shortly after the requirement that those who extend their visas based on foreign income have to register with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This was posted a few days ago in this thread:
.http://www.udonmap.com/udonthaniforum/viewtopic.php?t=5610
It seems they are being very careful that retirees are living off of funds brought from outside the country rather than earnings from here.







