This year the BoT has certainly been well on the back of the drag curve with regard to its ability to analyse the impact of major events on the Thai economy.
Earlier this year there was the Japanese Tsunami, while it was unexpected the resulting disruption to manufacturing production did not need rocket science to predict it; now we have the Thai floods, these have taken weeks to arrive in Bangkok and required even less rocket science to predict (to the best of my knowledge water has always had a tendency to flow downhill).
I commented back in April on the minutes of the BoT MPC meeting that:
..... there may be a degree of wishful thinking with regard to the likely depth and duration of the impact of the disruption from Japan.
Just last week prior to the last MPC meeting I commented that:
..... there should already be sufficient evidence of the structural impact to the economy of the flooding to provide an opportunity for the MPC both to change course (without losing face) and also to demonstrate that it can be proactive rather than reactive.
..... the minutes of the MPC have demonstrated that they (or their advisors) have a tendency to wear rose tinted glasses when looking at the resilience of the Thai economy in the face of seismic movements (literally and financially) in the world - e.g. the way that they seriously underestimated the impact of the Japanese Tsunami on the manufacturing sector of the Thai economy.
The BoT has been demonstrating for some time that its analyses of events that impact on Thailand, when translated into monetary policy, are imbued with an unrealistic and excessive degree of optimism.
While (IMHO) it would be irresponsible to produce doom and gloom analyses (as they invariably result in self-fulfilling prophecies), the responsibility of stewardship of a central bank in these troubled times requires a view of events containing a far greater degree of critical thinking, realism and proactiveness rather than the rose tinted view which results in continually being on the back foot and only reacting after the event.
With regard to the obsession over inflation, it is my view that the bulk of inflation that Thailand has suffered is one of the unintended consequences of QE and similar measures in the US, UK and Europe as the same financial institutions that caused the 2008 meltdown were, due to the fungible nature of money, effectively able to continue their gambling addiction with bets on the Asian commodity markets.
The BoT could control this by imposing appropriate capital flow measures on the currency market (the gamblers would, as usual, squeal about "socialism" and "government interference" with the "free" market, but inflation would be kept in check).