Udon Thani Forum
Facebook twitter Youtube Rss
ABS Relocations

  • Advertisement

Thailand rejects Bout extradition

World news discussion forum

Thailand rejects Bout extradition

Postby Fawn » August 12, 2009, 3:36 am

Source: BBC

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8194824.stm

A Thai court has rejected a US request for the extradition of Viktor Bout, an alleged Russian arms dealer dubbed the "Merchant of Death".
The United States wants to put Mr Bout on trial on charges of supplying weapons to Colombian Farc rebels.
"The US charges are not applicable under Thai law," said a Thai judge, who described the US case against Mr Bout as political, not criminal.
Mr Bout was arrested in a Thai-US sting operation in March 2008.
"This is a political case. The Farc is fighting for a political cause and is not a criminal gang. Thailand does not recognise the Farc as a terrorist group," said the judge delivering the verdict at Bangkok's Criminal Court.
The Unites States has 72 hours in which to appeal against the ruling, during which time Mr Bout, 42, will remain in detention.
A decision in the extradition hearing has been repeatedly delayed by a high turnover of defence lawyers.
United Nations agencies and several Western governments have reported that Mr Bout has delivered arms to dictators and warlords in Africa and Afghanistan, allegedly breaking several UN arms embargoes in the process.
He faces US charges of conspiring to kill Americans, conspiring to provide material support to terrorists and conspiring to acquire and use an anti-aircraft missile. He could face a maximum penalty of life in prison if convicted in the US.
His lawyer argues that Mr Bout would not receive a fair trial in the US, where officials say he supplied arms to dictators, al-Qaeda and the Taleban.
He is being held in a maximum security prison outside Bangkok.
Doug! Doug! Doug!
User avatar
Fawn
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 942
Joined: July 15, 2008, 3:44 am

Re: Thailand rejects Bout extradition

Postby BKKSTAN » August 12, 2009, 10:33 am

:( And where is the UN? :roll: Why does America have to be the one to pursue characters like this?
User avatar
BKKSTAN
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 9223
Joined: July 18, 2005, 12:55 pm
Location: Nong Khai

Re: Thailand rejects Bout extradition

Postby seymourbutts » August 12, 2009, 12:41 pm

Maybe because its americas business, or maybe because america applied to have him extradited??? Maybe america didnt have to and neither did the un, maybe he has oil hidden somewhere unlike the most deserving place on this planet burma, you know the place where no-one can make a buck, uk included!!!!
User avatar
seymourbutts
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 394
Joined: September 15, 2008, 12:08 pm

Re: Thailand rejects Bout extradition

Postby Michael C » August 12, 2009, 12:52 pm

BKKSTAN wrote: :( And where is the UN? :roll: Why does America have to be the one to pursue characters like this?

Oh, yes, the international courts, like The Hague, international conventions like The Hague Convention and Geneva Convention that America does not recognise, by not being signatories to them? :roll:

Why is it America that is going after Bout? It is because it is in America's own interest and if it was not, America would not care to do anything about him.

What was Bout's crime? Oh, yes, in the extradition case, it is supplying arms to an organisation, Farc, not recognised by Thailand as a terrorist organisation. Not in this case is that he delivered arms to places, like Afghanistan, but wait, wasn't America supplying the predecessors of the Taleban in Afghanistan? Were they prosecuted in the US or handed over to another country or an international tribunal? Oh, that is right, that was in America's interest and sanctioned by the Senate Intelligence Committee, CIA = US Government. I wonder how many of those same US Government supplied weapons are currently being used AGAINST the US military and their allies?

Maybe the 'problem' of Thailand being a sovereign nation and following its laws, not yielding to America's political and military power, might be a result of the failed attempt to bully Thailand into being actively involved in America's wars of this decade, e.g. not allowing foreign forces to operate in war/military operations from their soil and suffering economic consequences for it. Imagine the outrage that Americans would have at another country demanding the use of its soil for the prosecution of an illegal war against another country. Would America hand over Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and others responsible for an illegal war over to another country or to the international courts? I think not.

Is Bout a scum bag, who should be put away for the rest of his life? Yes. Should Thailand bow to America's political and military power when it is not in accordance with Thai law? Absolutely not!
User avatar
Michael C
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 240
Joined: April 15, 2008, 9:08 pm
Location: ปทุมธานี

Re: Thailand rejects Bout extradition

Postby BKKSTAN » August 12, 2009, 3:33 pm

''United Nations agencies and several Western governments have reported that Mr Bout has delivered arms to dictators and warlords in Africa and Afghanistan, allegedly breaking several UN arms embargoes in the process.''
My point was directed to why the UN has not taken action against him,if in fact he has broken UN arms embargos!
I do understand that America is pursueing their interests and accept that Thailand is serving theirs!

No quarrel there! :D
User avatar
BKKSTAN
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 9223
Joined: July 18, 2005, 12:55 pm
Location: Nong Khai

Re: Thailand rejects Bout extradition

Postby Michael C » August 12, 2009, 4:21 pm

Stan, sorry for being a little defensive on the side of Thailand. I made the mistake of thinking this thread was denigrating into another one of those threads beating up on Thailand, the Thai Government and all things Thai as so many active threads appear to have.
User avatar
Michael C
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 240
Joined: April 15, 2008, 9:08 pm
Location: ปทุมธานี

Re: Thailand rejects Bout extradition

Postby rick » August 13, 2009, 1:36 am

Does the UN actually have any authority to extradite and try individuals? I doubt it, as it is not a sovereign government. Anyway, the UN is toothless and unable to even make the most insignificant government do anything, unless actual nations vote to do so AND back it up with actions, not just words.
User avatar
rick
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 860
Joined: January 9, 2008, 10:36 am
Location: Hampshire, udon twice a year

Re: Thailand rejects Bout extradition

Postby Fawn » August 13, 2009, 2:03 am

Michael C wrote:I made the mistake of thinking this thread was denigrating into another one of those threads beating up on Thailand, the Thai Government and all things Thai as so many active threads appear to have.


I posted this because it was an interesting contrast to the impending extradition of Gary McKinnon from the UK to the US for military computer hacking.

Source: BBC

Hacker loses extradition appeal

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8177561.stm

At the risk of being accused of beating up Thailand, I believe the Thai Government or Judiciary are holding out for something. In other words, there's a political dimension* attached to all this. Consequently, I believe Viktor Bout will go to the US just as Gary McKinnon will.

* My favourite word tonight.
Doug! Doug! Doug!
User avatar
Fawn
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 942
Joined: July 15, 2008, 3:44 am

Re: Thailand rejects Bout extradition

Postby wazza » August 13, 2009, 4:12 am

Ur not saying that Thailand is like Burma and N Korea and wanting a bit of action before signing off on an extradition.

NO NO NO.

Lets see a favourable reduction in sanctions to Burma to allow the precious jewelery ( gems etc ) that are mined in Burma and processed in Thailand and exported to the US. Apparantly this sanction has cost Thailand Millions !
User avatar
wazza
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 3937
Joined: April 2, 2006, 9:06 pm
Location: "Stunners that would give Jelly Fish a horn"

Re: Thailand rejects Bout extradition

Postby BKKSTAN » August 13, 2009, 7:56 am

rick wrote:Does the UN actually have any authority to extradite and try individuals? I doubt it, as it is not a sovereign government. Anyway, the UN is toothless and unable to even make the most insignificant government do anything, unless actual nations vote to do so AND back it up with actions, not just words.

I totally agree!
User avatar
BKKSTAN
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 9223
Joined: July 18, 2005, 12:55 pm
Location: Nong Khai

Re: Thailand rejects Bout extradition

Postby BarnicaleBob » August 13, 2009, 8:15 am

I think the system in Thailand is working but because of possible backroom dealing the extradition of Viktor Bout is being delayed. I’m don’t want to say that Thailand is acting like a typical third world nation in trying to get something out of this, even the super powers do this from time to time. As an American I have strong feelings about people that support people with weapons that use those weapons on civilian populations (attacks on airliners, car bombings in public places and genocide of civilian populations.
Viktor Bout has supplied rouge regimes and terrorists that do these things and in my book that make him an enemy of humanity.
User avatar
BarnicaleBob
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 78
Joined: June 12, 2009, 1:10 am

Re: Thailand rejects Bout extradition

Postby jackspratt » August 13, 2009, 12:12 pm

Bout has done no more, or less, than several well known Western and other countries, in supplying weapons to unsavoury regimes around the world. :shock:

Should we push for some moral equivalence here, and demand the arrest and trial of the responsible parties in the countries I mention above :roll:

Having been happy to use Bout's services for a number of years when it suited their purposes (albeit that his dubious activities were already well known), it would seem that the US, for whatever (political) reason, has now had a change of heart.

Neither hypocrisy nor expediency are good looks. [-X [-X [-X
User avatar
jackspratt
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 5867
Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm
Location: Ban Dung

Re: Thailand rejects Bout extradition

Postby laphanphon » August 13, 2009, 12:27 pm

when 1st arrested, i figured this guy has way too much money and wouldn't be in jail long, and escape, or judicial mistake and released.........oops. i'm quite surprised he is still here. not surprised he is not getting extradited, for the obvious, negative reason.

i can't think of anything the thai gov't could ask of usa for his extradition, as the usa already give thailand anything they ask for and look the other way on everything. since one of the only SE Asian friends, well, supposeded friend, the usa have in the region.
GOOD BYE CRUEL WORLD
User avatar
laphanphon
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 6002
Joined: July 4, 2005, 7:47 pm

Re: Thailand rejects Bout extradition

Postby BobHelm » February 17, 2010, 10:27 am

Well this tale just rumbles on & on.
Appeared in court on 16th. & another 'reason' for returning him to USA was rejected. He has now been in custody in Thailand for nearly 2 years awaiting some sort of resolution.
http://english.ruvr.ru/2010/02/16/4477705.html
User avatar
BobHelm
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 10549
Joined: September 7, 2005, 11:58 pm
Location: Udon Thani

Re: Thailand rejects Bout extradition

Postby Texpat » February 17, 2010, 1:54 pm

"The judges have rejected the request to add to the case a letter by the Colombian Foreign Minister to the effect that the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, whom Bout has allegedly tried to sell arms to, is a terrorist organization. The Thai judges agreed that FARC is a political organization."

I wonder if those Thai judges view the revolutionary separatist movement in Pattani, Yala and Narathiwat as a political organization.
User avatar
Texpat
udonmap.com
 
Posts: 1306
Joined: July 21, 2007, 1:43 am


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    Views
    Author

Return to World News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

  • Advertisement