A citation AT LAST. Always more polite to provide the link than fob people off with the unhelpful, "Google is your friend" or the downright rude, "go do your own 'research'". Many thanks.fatbob wrote: ↑February 14, 2021, 12:46 pmTamada you really are a piece of works. You obviously chose not to see the source so you could make another useless attempt at your bent humour.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact ... SKBN28V2T2
Funnily enough, it appears to be a MSM item (one of a several) that indicates that the official and verified correct numbers are in fact worse than the "official numbers" being bandied about on social media by the pandemic deniers.
Since you originally opined that because the Covid vaccine isn't guaranteed to prevent infection in everyone, then it's not a real vaccine, when you take off at a brisk canter into the fake numbers stakes and suddenly appear to nobble yourself, well I hope you can appreciate my confusion and I am sure I'm not alone in that.