Your 5 Dominant Traits?

Post by **Laan Yaa Mo** » April 23, 2015, 6:55 pm

What are yours? Mine turned out to be: You Are (1) Stable, (2) Reliable, (3) Cautious, (4) Goal-Oriented, And (5) A Perfectionist, which is true to a certain extent.

http://www.playbuzz.com/billross10/what ... _shares_ca

Post by **noosard** » April 23, 2015, 7:05 pm

curious, thoughtful, reserved, perceptive, and analytical.

Post by **BobHelm** » April 23, 2015, 7:07 pm

I think you are making the answers up to some of these yourself Uncle...

You Are (1) Competitive, (2) Self-Assured, (3) Leadership-Oriented, (4) Affectionate, And (5) An Attention-Seeker

Not true, I tell you from the centre of the stage....

Post by **Laan Yaa Mo** » April 23, 2015, 7:13 pm

From the side of the stage viewing the central figures, these conclusions seem to be more on the ball than most. Khun Helm, you do possess the traits needed to be a neutral and cultured moderator? Should that read neutered? No, I think not.

Post by **DuiDui49** » April 23, 2015, 9:22 pm

You Are (1) Stable, (2) Reliable, (3) Cautious, (4) Goal-Oriented, And (5) A Perfectionist

Post by **old timer** » April 23, 2015, 10:32 pm

Gullible, well stupid, pisses of the relatives with unwanted snides, homo tendencies towards an elderly guitarist, --------.

OT......................... $\:D/$

Post by **GT93** » April 24, 2015, 3:20 pm

I thought many of you geezers might be: lustful, lustful, lustful, lustful and lustful. OT is perhaps a bit more balanced although 747man may disagree.

Post by **Aardvark** » April 25, 2015, 6:04 am

I hope your not Profiling us .... You Are (1) Stable, (2) Reliable, (3) Cautious, (4) Goal-Oriented, And (5) A Perfectionist

Post by **GT93** » April 25, 2015, 6:09 am

What do you think jack might be Aardy? Now be kind!

Post by **Aardvark** » April 25, 2015, 10:04 am

Stop stirring 93, I have all the respect in the World for Jack. We just don't agree on some things ....

Post by **GT93** » April 25, 2015, 1:28 pm

I haven't even looked at the link but that doesn't stop me spewing forth. I suspect the link would spit out that even Richard Nixon was a decent chap.

Post by **Laan Yaa Mo** » April 25, 2015, 9:53 pm

As a political and foreign policy analyst, Nixon was excellent; however, in the Oval Office, he left a bit to be desired.

Post by **GT93** » April 26, 2015, 4:29 am

"A bit to be desired"? That's your caution expressing itself LYM.

I don't think Tricky Dicky would ever be described as cautious. I agree he was a very sharp fellow in many respects. It would have been interesting to see him and Kissinger in charge in the modern era.

Post by **glalt** » April 26, 2015, 1:34 pm

GT93 wrote:I haven't even looked at the link but that doesn't stop me spewing forth. I suspect the link would spit out that even Richard Nixon was a decent chap.

Nixon spied on one office. Obama spied on the entire country.