pompui wrote:jackspratt wrote:
Can you explain again what this means:
.............no point going there for a beer if am having to throw it up the next minute
No point in
who going there for a beer?
.
What the **** is going on here,that is my post Jack,not Benzona's
If you have the time,read my post in the context to responding to a Mr Mash post
What get me riled Pompui is these idiots try to score old man back slapping points by raising pathetic facts taken out of context in order that they can high five each other at the night meetings.
Jack full well knew that was not me saying that, that is why he PURPOSELY left out the quoter's name.
All of a sudden Jack has become troll numero uno in this thread, lying, avoiding questions, attacking me with pointless arguments that do nothing except , well refer to my first sentence....
In all reality, what the hell does it matter if i did have one beer some months ago, I don't drink, end of story... I certainly do not have to lie about my alcohol consumption to continue a conversation with a few pensioners whos 19th century views seem to indicate that they take abuse from lying wimmen laying down....give up their kids, and then line the pockets of the tramp forever.... (classy outlook guys) and if it was at nutty park i slipped in a beer, it was probably to wipe away the lingering sight of loads of old men draping their wallets around young girls and claiming it as love
Is that the best you can do Jack, cos its pretty LAME, and Bam... don't be an troll, quoting things i supposedly said, and then not including the quotes make you look like a bit of a dingus ... so how about backing up what you say with the actual quote please..
You guys (the trolling foursome) would be lost in an evidence based proceeding, you are pathetic and if it makes you feel better thinking i was drunk at 6pm when i wrote that (even though it was 9pm and i was sober)then go ahead and think it. I could not care less and you make yourself look even stupider to anyone who looks in