Sorry if I'm flogging this, but to me it's an important issue, particularly as many Thai are themselves recognizing that corruption has to stop.
Reddevil
"Very first post said receipt no problem so I take it they did get one. I must say that when I went last friday I did question the service and was told by the young lady that I must use the service"
I recall the first post, but I wasn't sure whether he meant he received one, or wasn't bothered about getting one.
But, did YOU get a receipt on Friday? If so, was it numbered and like the one issued for payment of the visa fee? If not, you've made a small contribution to the Officer's apartment rental!
A must? No, I wouldn't believe the young lady and Mathusalah80 has indicated it's optional and he used his own forms.
Seagulls
"What on earth is a "Recognised free service ? In all my years of living on three continents I have yet to encounter
anything Free from the civil service ,nor would I expect any"
Please see Khun Paul and Papaguido's posts. (My example similar to Papaguido's)
I think I know what you mean, Seagulls. It's difficult to imagine going into any government-type office and not paying to get something done, one way or another.
But it does happen at Immigration, in that you don't always officially have to put cash across the counter. As Paul indicates, there is a official list of services and fees applicable - the visa fee obviously, re-entry fee etc. If it's not on the list, they shouldn't be charging. Those of us around for a while, with posts to the effect on this site, know that e.g.transfer of visa details from old to new passport is free (yet THE female officer wanted 500 baht from me for a few minutes work), forms/letters needed for the Amphoe or Driving Centre also cost nothing etc. - they are not on the list, no official receipt is given - BUT my point is that officers will sometimes try to charge you.
I suggest it's a lack of proper organization that there aren't fees for everything. Nobody has got round to sorting it out properly and thus the temptation to make money on the side. Many, like yourself, seem ok with putting money in officers' back pockets and wouldn't presumably object to paying a reasonable, official fee to get this or that done. Then it is official and not corruption. I certainly have no problem with paying officially, proper receipt issued and, again, I've suggested the additional income might be recycled into officers' salaries. Seems fair enough to me.
The rider to these new arrangements would then be that it should be made perfectly clear that Officers found to be corrupt should be thrown out of the Service.