Earnest wrote: ↑April 4, 2023, 12:34 am
555! Good one, Billy Ricky Thingy, although I did have to use Google Translate.
AlexO wrote: ↑April 3, 2023, 12:50 am
Not saying anything Ernie apart from you are 'wrong'....Not back at all, have better things to do with my time than joust with you lot, though I do see you are attempting to take over the super trolls crown.
Am I?
It seems a couple of pensioners here label a chap as a troll if he dares to disagree with them.
Hang on, readers, what's this?
In Scotland, the Scottish National Party (SNP) is a left social democratic[1] political party which campaigns for Scottish independence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_o ... dependence.
If I'm 'wrong' (your italics) then it follows that a sizeable number of left social democratic voters will vote for a central right party...or not vote at all. But don't worry your lttle head about it for now, Alex, let's wait for a general election.
But wait...
The SNP leader, Humza Yousaf, has been voted in by MSPs as Scotland’s youngest first minister and the first from a minority ethnic background.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... background.
Well, that's not very democratic, is it. Did the SNP members get a chance to vote?
[/quote
Oh Dear Ernie
I hardly think that a forum such as UM is the best place to highlight any ageism issues you have is it? The fact that you are trying to denigrate the age or working status of people posting should really be something the moderators should have a wee look at.
As to the real issue Scotland, if you actually knew what you were talking about instead of just throwing inane comments into the ring you would know that there was a leadership election held by the Cult (SNP) with hustings held over a full month. Fully paid up members of the Cult were allowed to vote on the election of the leadership of the Cult (SNP)
. There were lots of false information (LIES) issued by the Cults party hierarchy as to how many members there were which resulted in some very high profile resignations (including the previous Cult leaders husband) when the truth was finally published. The Cult now has a new leader who won because less than 26,000 sheeple voted for it as preferred candidate. The article in the Guardian relates to some other nonsense that was imposed on the devolved Assembly by Tony Bliar that requires the Assembly to confirm that the leader of the majority voting party in the Assembly is also the 1st Minister of Scotland, as if they are going to vote against their own leader!!!
Just some other info on the Scottish Assembly so you don't look foolish next post.
The Cult do not have a majority vote in the Assembly, they are in a toxic coalition with the Marxist Green party this gives them a voting majority at Holyrood but results in the Greens (who are only list MSPs due to a stupid voting system foisted on Scotland by, yes you guessed it, Bliar again) having a stupid amount of say in policy making.
Scotland so long a Liebour Party stronghold (make sure you are sitting down dear chap) has 22 Labour MSPs as opposed to the Tory's 31 (bet that hurts) so yes people may turn to a center right party when they decide enough is enough (think that time has come already) The description of the SNP(Cult) is not wholly correct, the Cult is a mish mash of differing political preferences, (they even tried to enter into a coalition with Nazi Germany to say they would Govern Scotland on behalf of Hitler when/if the Nazi's invaded England) basically a one trick pony party with the trick being independence. The current vote catching 'everything is free' policies they have just now are only possible because Westminster picks up the massive spending deficit the SNP/Green coalition have every year.
So hopefully you have taken in a few bits of 'real' information and can stop posting nonsense about Scotland and its unique political situation.
Better you just lie back and wallow in the gushing praise from the Pratt, who's hero worship of you and Tam is almost vomit inducing.
Bye for now.