Quality peedophile.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... dApp_Other
Been many Tam, over the whole political spectrum. Its not just a Tory thing.tamada wrote: ↑April 15, 2022, 4:48 pmQuality peedophile.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... dApp_Other
Come on then, who was worse than Cyril Smith et all. Not trying to protect anyone, but it is not just a Tory thing. Then there is Starmer who receives a Knighthood for ignored child sex abuse on a grand scale just because it would upset an ethnic minority who vote labour mostly. Who is worse???stattointhailand wrote: ↑April 20, 2022, 3:38 pm"Its not just a Tory thing."
may be not, but they are the undisputed leaders in class (or should that be non class )
Got to agree but right now, the incumbents do seem to have a larger contingent than many?
The upper echelons of the UK's security services, both domestic and international, have a history riven with benders, poofs and turncoats.GT93 wrote: ↑April 21, 2022, 12:55 amMI5 would be better positioned than Thatcher to know what might be happening. Their failure to consider the interests of victims is appalling and raises questions about how well they were also managing their core tasks. Organizations can become too insular and not have enough fresh air sweeping through. This makes them weaker.
Possibly, but unlike others they do draw the line at fluffy sheeptamada wrote: ↑April 21, 2022, 12:22 pmThe upper echelons of the UK's security services, both domestic and international, have a history riven with benders, poofs and turncoats.GT93 wrote: ↑April 21, 2022, 12:55 amMI5 would be better positioned than Thatcher to know what might be happening. Their failure to consider the interests of victims is appalling and raises questions about how well they were also managing their core tasks. Organizations can become too insular and not have enough fresh air sweeping through. This makes them weaker.
Yes and this would have been an obvious security risk back then. It doesn't appear to have been properly managed. I didn't mean letting the loonies in statts.tamada wrote: ↑April 21, 2022, 12:22 pmThe upper echelons of the UK's security services, both domestic and international, have a history riven with benders, poofs and turncoats.GT93 wrote: ↑April 21, 2022, 12:55 amMI5 would be better positioned than Thatcher to know what might be happening. Their failure to consider the interests of victims is appalling and raises questions about how well they were also managing their core tasks. Organizations can become too insular and not have enough fresh air sweeping through. This makes them weaker.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... tive-partyMPs have expressed outrage over comments made by the Conservative MP Crispin Blunt about the guilty verdict in Imran Ahmad Khan’s sexual assault trial.
Blunt, the MP for Reigate since 1997 and chair of the all-party parliamentary group on LGBTQ+ rights, said he was certain Khan was innocent and that the trial “was nothing short of an international scandal”.
The MP for Wakefield was expelled from the Conservative party with “immediate effect” hours after being convicted of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old boy.
“I am utterly appalled and distraught at the dreadful miscarriage of justice that has befallen my friend and colleague Imran Ahmad Khan, MP for Wakefield since December 2019,” Blunt said in a statement.
“I sat through some of the trial. The conduct of this case relied on lazy tropes about LGBT+ people that we might have thought we had put behind us decades ago,” he said.
“As a former justice minister, I was prepared to testify about the truly extraordinary sequence of events that has resulted in Imran being put through this nightmare start to his parliamentary career.”
Three MPs have since resigned from the APPG – Scottish National party MPs Stewart McDonald and Joanna Cherry, and Labour MP Chris Bryant.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... istract-pmAngela Rayner has hit out at “sexism and misogyny” in politics, as a storm of criticism erupted after a newspaper reported that she crosses and uncrosses her legs during prime minister’s questions to distract Boris Johnson.
Cabinet ministers including Johnson himself, and MPs from across the House of Commons condemned the Mail on Sunday report, which the chair of the House of Commons women and equalities committee, Caroline Nokes, a Conservative, called a “dirty little story”.
The paper reported that unnamed senior Tories had “mischievously” suggested Labour’s deputy leader deploys what it called “a fully clothed parliamentary equivalent of Sharon Stone’s infamous scene in the 1992 film Basic Instinct”.