Page 1 of 1

W3C(validator)

Posted: January 3, 2014, 6:00 pm
by trubrit
Logged in today and saw that on line. What is it?

W3C(validator)

Posted: January 3, 2014, 6:25 pm
by mortiboy
I would have thought even you TB would have googled it!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W3C_Markup ... on_Service

W3C(validator)

Posted: January 3, 2014, 8:52 pm
by trubrit
mortiboy wrote:I would have thought even you TB would have googled it!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W3C_Markup ... on_Service
Why even me , am I that special? :-"
In fact I very rarely use the google search engine , preferring to rely on my own vast experience or as in this case, hoping others would know. :-"

W3C(validator)

Posted: January 3, 2014, 8:55 pm
by mortiboy
trubrit wrote:
mortiboy wrote:I would have thought even you TB would have googled it!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W3C_Markup ... on_Service
Why even me , am I that special? :-"
In fact I very rarely use the google search engine , preferring to rely on my own vast experience or as in this case, hoping others would know. :-"
Yeah OK ! :-"

W3C(validator)

Posted: January 3, 2014, 8:59 pm
by jackspratt
trubrit wrote:
mortiboy wrote:I would have thought even you TB would have googled it!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W3C_Markup ... on_Service
Why even me , am I that special? :-"
In fact I very rarely use the google search engine , preferring to rely on my own vast experience or as in this case, hoping others would know. :-"
Val, while this may seem hard to believe, google has more wisdom than even the combined knowledge (and experience) of all of us on UM. :shock:

W3C(validator)

Posted: January 4, 2014, 7:13 am
by trubrit
jackspratt wrote:


Val, while this may seem hard to believe, google has more wisdom than even the combined knowledge (and experience) of all of us on UM. :shock:
Jack, while this may seem hard to believe, it also contains more inaccuracies , misinformation and prejudices than our esteemed contributors are capable of as well. :-" :lol: