BP

General off-topic debates and discussions forum.
Post Reply
cookie
udonmap.com
Posts: 2235
Joined: September 29, 2006, 8:52 pm

BP

Post by cookie » June 5, 2011, 6:37 pm

.Superb essay that shows the connection between extremely powerful corporations (as BP) and unrestricted capitalism,
he explains how unrestricted capitalism, will lead to extremely powerful corporations ( BP and Co.) that will control the government which will help the corporation in rigging the market to their advantage
Chris Hedges' Columns
BP and the ‘Little Eichmanns’


By Chris Hedges

Cultures that do not recognize that human life and the natural world have a sacred dimension, an intrinsic value beyond monetary value, cannibalize themselves until they die. They ruthlessly exploit the natural world and the members of their society in the name of progress until exhaustion or collapse, blind to the fury of their own self-destruction. The oil pouring into the Gulf of Mexico, estimated to be perhaps as much as 100,000 barrels a day, is part of our foolish death march. It is one more blow delivered by the corporate state, the trade of life for gold. But this time collapse, when it comes, will not be confined to the geography of a decayed civilization. It will be global.

Those who carry out this global genocide—men like BP’s Chief Executive Tony Hayward, who assures us that “The Gulf of Mexico is a very big ocean. The amount of oil and dispersant we are putting into it is tiny in relation to the total water volume’’—are, to steal a line from Ward Churchill, “little Eichmanns.” They serve Thanatos, the forces of death, the dark instinct Sigmund Freud identified within human beings that propels us to annihilate all living things, including ourselves. These deformed individuals lack the capacity for empathy. They are at once banal and dangerous. They possess the peculiar ability to organize vast, destructive bureaucracies and yet remain blind to the ramifications. The death they dispense, whether in the pollutants and carcinogens that have made cancer an epidemic, the dead zone rapidly being created in the Gulf of Mexico, the melting polar ice caps or the deaths last year of 45,000 Americans who could not afford proper medical care, is part of the cold and rational exchange of life for money.

The corporations, and those who run them, consume, pollute, oppress and kill.
The little Eichmanns who manage them reside in a parallel universe of staggering wealth, luxury and splendid isolation that rivals that of the closed court of Versailles. The elite, sheltered and enriched, continue to prosper even as the rest of us and the natural world start to die. They are numb. They will drain the last drop of profit from us until there is nothing left. And our business schools and elite universities churn out tens of thousands of these deaf, dumb and blind systems managers who are endowed with sophisticated skills of management and the incapacity for common sense, compassion or remorse. These technocrats mistake the art of manipulation with knowledge.

“The longer one listened to him, the more obvious it became that his inability to speak was closely connected with an inability to think, namely, to think from the standpoint of somebody else,” Hannah Arendt wrote of “Eichmann in Jerusalem.” “No communication was possible with him, not because he lied but because he was surrounded by the most reliable of all safeguards against words and the presence of others, and hence against reality as such.”

Our ruling class of technocrats, as John Ralston Saul points out, is effectively illiterate. “One of the reasons that he is unable to recognize the necessary relationship between power and morality is that moral traditions are the product of civilization and he has little knowledge of his own civilization,” Saul writes of the technocrat. Saul calls these technocrats “hedonists of power,” and warns that their “obsession with structures and their inability or unwillingness to link these to the public good make this power an abstract force—a force that works, more often than not, at cross-purposes to the real needs of a painfully real world.”

BP, which made $6.1 billion in profits in the first quarter of this year, never obtained permits from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The protection of the ecosystem did not matter. But BP is hardly alone. Drilling with utter disregard to the ecosystem is common practice among oil companies, according to a report in The New York Times. Our corporate state has gutted environmental regulation as tenaciously as it has gutted financial regulation and habeas corpus. Corporations make no distinction between our personal impoverishment and the impoverishment of the ecosystem that sustains the human species. And the abuse, of us and the natural world, is as rampant under Barack Obama as it was under George W. Bush. The branded figure who sits in the White House is a puppet, a face used to mask an insidious system under which we as citizens have been disempowered and under which we become, along with the natural world, collateral damage. As Karl Marx understood, unfettered capitalism is a revolutionary force. And this force is consuming us.

Karl Polanyi in his book “The Great Transformation,” written in 1944, laid out the devastating consequences—the depressions, wars and totalitarianism—that grow out of a so-called self-regulated free market. He grasped that “fascism, like socialism, was rooted in a market society that refused to function.” He warned that a financial system always devolved, without heavy government control, into a Mafia capitalism—and a Mafia political system—which is a good description of our corporate government. Polanyi warned that when nature and human beings are objects whose worth is determined by the market, then human beings and nature are destroyed. Speculative excesses and growing inequality, he wrote, always dynamite the foundation for a continued prosperity and ensure “the demolition of society.”
“In disposing of a man’s labor power the system would, incidentally, dispose of the physical, psychological, and moral entity ‘man’ attached to that tag,” Polanyi wrote. “Robbed of the protective covering of cultural institutions, human beings would perish from the effects of social exposure; they would die as victims of acute social dislocation through vice, perversion, crime, and starvation. Nature would be reduced to its elements, neighborhoods and landscapes defiled, rivers polluted, military safety jeopardized, the power to produce food and raw materials destroyed. Finally, the market administration of purchasing power would periodically liquidate business enterprise, for shortages and surfeits of money would prove as disastrous to business as floods and droughts in primitive society. Undoubtedly, labor, land, and money markets are essential to a market economy. But no society could stand the effects of such a system of crude fictions even for the shortest stretch of time unless its human and natural substance as well as its business organizations was protected against the ravages of this satanic mill.”

The corporate state is a runaway freight train.
It shreds the Kyoto Accords in Copenhagen. It plunders the U.S. Treasury so speculators can continue to gamble with billions in taxpayer subsidies in our perverted system of casino capitalism. It disenfranchises our working class, decimates our manufacturing sector and denies us funds to sustain our infrastructure, our public schools and our social services. It poisons the planet. We are losing, every year across the globe, an area of farmland greater than Scotland to erosion and urban sprawl. There are an estimated 25,000 people who die every day somewhere in the world because of contaminated water. And some 20 million children are mentally impaired each year by malnourishment.

America is dying in the manner in which all imperial projects die. Joseph Tainter, in his book “The Collapse of Complex Societies,” argues that the costs of running and defending an empire eventually become so burdensome, and the elite becomes so calcified, that it becomes more efficient to dismantle the imperial superstructures and return to local forms of organization. At that point the great monuments to empire, from the Sumer and Mayan temples to the Roman bath complexes, are abandoned, fall into disuse and are overgrown. But this time around, Tainter warns, because we have nowhere left to migrate and expand, “world civilization will disintegrate as a whole.” This time around we will take the planet down with us.

“We in the lucky countries of the West now regard our two-century bubble of freedom and affluence as normal and inevitable; it has even been called the ‘end’ of history, in both a temporal and teleological sense,” writes Ronald Wright in “A Short History of Progress.” “Yet this new order is an anomaly: the opposite of what usually happens as civilizations grow. Our age was bankrolled by the seizing of half the planet, extended by taking over most of the remaining half, and has been sustained by spending down new forms of natural capital, especially fossil fuels. In the New World, the West hit the biggest bonanza of all time. And there won’t be another like it—not unless we find the civilized Martians of H.G. Wells, complete with the vulnerability to our germs that undid them in his War of the Worlds.”

The moral and physical contamination is matched by a cultural contamination. Our political and civil discourse has become gibberish. It is dominated by elaborate spectacles, celebrity gossip, the lies of advertising and scandal. The tawdry and the salacious occupy our time and energy. We do not see the walls falling around us. We invest our intellectual and emotional energy in the inane and the absurd, the empty amusements that preoccupy a degenerate culture, so that when the final collapse arrives we can be herded, uncomprehending and fearful, into the inferno.



User avatar
jackspratt
udonmap.com
Posts: 16156
Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm

BP

Post by jackspratt » June 6, 2011, 2:24 pm

^^ Long on hyperbole, and short on evidence.

cookie
udonmap.com
Posts: 2235
Joined: September 29, 2006, 8:52 pm

BP

Post by cookie » June 7, 2011, 11:09 am

jackspratt wrote:^^ Long on hyperbole, and short on evidence.
An essay is a piece of writing which is often written from an author's personal point of view. Essays can consist of a number of elements, including: literary criticism, political manifestos, learned arguments, observations of daily life, recollections, and reflections of the author.

User avatar
jackspratt
udonmap.com
Posts: 16156
Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm

BP

Post by jackspratt » June 7, 2011, 11:32 am

I got the "essay" bit cookie, but I struggled to find much on this:
shows the connection between extremely powerful corporations (as BP) and unrestricted capitalism,
he explains how unrestricted capitalism, will lead to extremely powerful corporations ( BP and Co.) that will control the government which will help the corporation in rigging the market to their advantage
in the essay.

cookie
udonmap.com
Posts: 2235
Joined: September 29, 2006, 8:52 pm

BP

Post by cookie » June 7, 2011, 3:16 pm

BP, which made $6.1 billion in profits in the first quarter of this year, never obtained permits from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The protection of the ecosystem did not matter. But BP is hardly alone. Drilling with utter disregard to the ecosystem is common practice among oil companies, according to a report in The New York Times. Our corporate state has gutted environmental regulation as tenaciously as it has gutted financial regulation and habeas corpus. Corporations make no distinction between our personal impoverishment and the impoverishment of the ecosystem that sustains the human species. And the abuse, of us and the natural world, is as rampant under Barack Obama as it was under George W. Bush.

cookie
udonmap.com
Posts: 2235
Joined: September 29, 2006, 8:52 pm

BP

Post by cookie » June 9, 2011, 10:44 am

arjay wrote:Was Tony Hayward right that BP's Gulf of Mexico oil disaster was 'modest'?

modest disaster ????? :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:
the arrogance of some people ( Tony & Co.) never stops to amaze me.....

Calling the explosion of deepwater horizon that KILLED 11 PEOPLE a modest disaster is :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

Calling an oil spill that flowed for 3 MONTHS a modest disaster is :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

Calling THE LARGEST accidental marine oil spill in the history of the petroleum industry a modest disaster is :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

Calling the spill of 206 MILLION GALLONS of oil a modest disaster is :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

Calling the loss of the livelihood of fishermen and business owners a modest disaster is :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

Calling the HUNDREDS OF MILES of Gulf shoreline stained with oil a modest disaster is :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:

Calling the spill that caused extensive damage to marine and wildlife habitats and to the Gulf's fishing and tourism industries a minor disaster is :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:


in the meantime :

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/06/08/tr ... ll-flawed/
Disasters
Transocean: Coast Guard report on oil spill flawed

Published June 08, 2011

| Associated Press



The owner of the oil rig that exploded in the Gulf of Mexico last year said Wednesday that a Coast Guard report that faults the company for a poor safety culture and other shortcomings that preceded the disaster is full of errors.

Transocean said in a 112-page response submitted to the U.S. government that the April 22 draft report should be corrected. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Regulation and Enforcement is expected to release a joint final report with the Coast Guard by late next month.

Switzerland-based Transocean insists the blast did not result from poor upkeep, that the blowout preventer was properly maintained and that the general alarm on the rig did not fail to operate automatically. It also said the engines on the rig did not fail to shut down upon detection of gas.

"When a report of this importance purports to reach conclusions and makes findings so at odds with the evidence, questions must be raised about the fact-finding process and whether an agenda, rather than evidence, served as the report's foundation," Transocean said in its response.

A spokeswoman for the joint federal investigation team declined to comment.

Multiple government and independent investigations have blamed a cascade of failures by several companies, including Transocean.

The Coast Guard said in its report that decisions made by workers aboard the rig "may have affected the explosions or their impact," such as failing to follow procedures for notifying other crew members about the emergency after the blast. It also said electrical equipment that may have ignited the explosion was poorly maintained, while gas alarms and automatic shutdown systems were bypassed so that they did not alert the crew. And, the report said, rig workers didn't receive adequate training on how and when to disconnect the rig from the well to avoid an explosion.

The April 2010 explosion aboard the Deepwater Horizon rig killed 11 workers and sparked the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history. BP PLC was leasing the rig from Transocean and owned a majority stake in the well a mile beneath the sea. According to government estimates, some 206 million gallons of oil were released by the well before it was capped three months after the explosion.

Hundreds of miles of Gulf shoreline were stained with oil, fishermen and business owners lost their livelihoods, and new regulations were imposed as the offshore drilling industry was put under a microscope. BP has spent tens of billions of dollars cleaning up the mess and compensating victims, and it is seeking to recoup some of its losses from its partners on the rig.

cookie
udonmap.com
Posts: 2235
Joined: September 29, 2006, 8:52 pm

BP

Post by cookie » June 24, 2011, 1:44 pm

Transocean report: BP didn’t assess risks properly before blowout *update*
Posted on June 22, 2011 at 7:11 am by Tom Fowler in Accidents, Gulf Oil Disaster



BP failed to properly assess, manage and communicate risks, didn’t adequately test cement and misinterpreted a key pressure test prior to the deadly blowout on the Deepwater Horizon rig, according to a report released by drilling contractor Transocean this morning.
BP failed to properly assess, manage and communicate risks, didn’t adequately test cement and misinterpreted a key pressure test prior to the deadly blowout on the Deepwater Horizon rig, according to a report released by drilling contractor Transocean this morning.

The accident was a “result of a succession of interrelated well design, construction, and temporary abandonment decisions,” mostly made by BP in the weeks before the spill, the report concludes, but the immediate cause of the accident was the failure of the final cement seal in the well.

BP’s well design led to a cement job design that was risky, but those risks and the failure to adequately test the integrity of the cement was not communicated properly to the rig crew or others by BP, Transocean said.

The final well completion and abandonment plan also wasn’t approved by regulators, the report notes, because of the constant stream of last-minute changes.

The report also faults cement contractor Halliburton for not adequately testing the cement or communicating the risks of the mix.

The blowout preventer on the rig was properly maintained, according to Transocean, but was overcome by the force of the blast and was unable to seal the well completely. A video animation showing how the blowout preventer failed can be seen here.

The two-volume report and accompanying documents can be found here.

BP said in a statement the report “cherry picked” facts to fit Transocean’s legal strategy. You can read the full text of BP’s statement and other reactions here.

A key driver behind many of BP’s risky decisions was the concern over whether the pressure of heavy drilling mud from the rig would be more than the pressure from the formation and lead to fractures that would lead the company to have to permanently abandon the well, Transocean says.

The well design BP used increased the risk, but rather than changing the well design, BP chose a technically complex nitrogen foam cement mix for the final cement job.

That cement mix left relatively little room for error and a just a small quantity of the cement was used. BP and Halliburton did not test it adequately before or after the cementing, the report says, and didn’t report the risks of those decisions to others properly.

The final test on the cement job, the negative pressure test, “was inadequately set up because of displacement calculation errors, a lack of adequate fluid volume monitoring, and a lack of management of change discipline when the well monitoring arrangement was switched during the test,” the report says.

The results were misinterpreted, the report says, but the results were accepted by BP officials who then decided to move forward with temporary abandonment of the well.

Both the final cement barrier failed and the float collar – a Weatherford built device that was supposed to prevent backflow up the well casing – “likely failed” the report says.

“None of the individuals monitoring the well, including the Transocean drill crew, initially detected the influx,” the report says.

In a conference call with reporters Transocean officials said they do not believe complacency on the part of their workers was a reason for the accident.

“After looking at the evidence we disagree with the idea that there was a sense of complacency on the rig,” said Bill Ambrose, Transocean’s director of North American operations.

Data from the rig’s instrumentation indicates the drilling crew was “very closely monitoring the well in the last hour” although the question remains if they were reading the data correctly, Ambrose said.

There have been reports from some BP workers that Transocean workers tried to explain away the odd negative pressure test readings as a phenomenon called “the bladder effect.” But Ambrose said no one on the rig that was interviewed by Transocean had ever heard of the term.
BP´s answer:
http://fuelfix.com/blog/2011/06/22/reac ... -pointing/

Transoceans full report:
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zht ... highlight=

User avatar
old-timer
udonmap.com
Posts: 2620
Joined: January 13, 2009, 12:36 pm

BP

Post by old-timer » July 15, 2011, 3:23 pm

It's been reported BP are investing GBP 3Billion in the North sea. BP have estimated they have a further 450 million barrels of "black gold" to pick up there.
Two people are pleased, one is The British Government with Justin Greening, the Economic secretary,saying its a major investment. The second one would be Arjay as it looks like his investment portfolio with BP is going to come to fruition - I hope he hasn't fainted or bought a new house on the strength of it just yet. Or dumped his holdings when things were not looking so bright, either way, don't mention it to the wife.

OT............... \:D/

User avatar
arjay
udonmap.com
Posts: 8349
Joined: October 2, 2005, 12:19 pm
Location: Gone to get a life, "troll free"

BP

Post by arjay » July 15, 2011, 5:15 pm

Yes, I did spot that one OT. I thought it rather flies in the face of HMG tax increase on north sea oil revenues, but was quite happy as yes I do still hold some BP shares. In fact I sold some, at a profit, a few months back, and have retained a slightly reduced holding. (I increased my holding of Shell).

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/news ... tment.html

http://www.firstenercastfinancial.com/n ... e-tax-hike

User avatar
arjay
udonmap.com
Posts: 8349
Joined: October 2, 2005, 12:19 pm
Location: Gone to get a life, "troll free"

BP

Post by arjay » July 16, 2011, 9:14 am

http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/New-Or ... 5zY28-?x=0

Common sense does seem to be prevailing:
New Orleans court dismisses BP raketeering allegations
telegraph

tweet
Print

Harry Wilson, 0:47, Saturday 16 July 2011

BP has scored a duo of legal successes as a US court yesterday rejected claims the energy company had defrauded regulators and put on hold another lawsuit.

The New Orleans court dismissed allegations that BP had broken anti-raketeering law by defrauding US regulators in relation to the safety standards of its drilling operations.

Judge Carl Barbier told the court that the case brought by a group of Gulf residents and businesses had failed to prove a "causal" link between the alleged fraud and last year's explosion and subsequent oil spill.

"In order for plaintiffs to prevail on their theory of causation, they must rely on this particular domino effect steeping from BP's alleged fraud," said Judge Barbier, adding that the link was "too remote".

In a separate action, Judge Barbier also put on hold a lawsuit brought against BP by Anadarko Petroleum Corp, one of the company's partners in its Gulf of Mexico drilling operations.

Anadarko owned a 25pc stake in the Macondo well that exploded last year killing 11 men working on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig.

In its lawsuit, Anadarko asked the court to rule that it was not responsible for any of the damages and clean-up cost resulting from the disaster.

Judge Barbier said Anadarko would have to take its claim to arbitration so that it and BP can argue over the separation of costs.

"Anadarko has not met its burden to overcome the presumption in favor of arbitration. Accordingly, Anadarko's claim against BP must be stayed pursuant to the arbitration clause" in the joint operating agreement between the parties," said Judge Barbier in his ruling.

The rulings came as BP said it planned to adopt "enhanced" drilling standards in the US, as it attempts to repair damaged relations in the country in the wake of the Gulf oil spill.

The oil giant will more closely oversee the work of outside contractors and only use blow-out preventers (BOP) with twin sets of shears which could slice through drill pipes. The Macondo spill was caused by a BOP failure. BP also said it would produce an enhanced oil spill response plan.

"BP's commitment in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon incident is not only to restore the economic and environmental conditions among the affected areas of the Gulf Coast, but also to apply what we have learned to improve the way we operate," said Bob Dudley, chief executive of BP.

BP shares closed up 0.2pc yesterday at 459p.

cookie
udonmap.com
Posts: 2235
Joined: September 29, 2006, 8:52 pm

BP

Post by cookie » July 19, 2011, 12:52 pm

perhaps time to sell the rest of the BP shares: ;) ;)

because here we go again:
BP reports Alaskan leak

By Tom Bergin and Yereth Rosen, Reuters

Tuesday, 19 July 2011


BP has reported another pipe- line leak at its Alaskan oilfields, frustrating the oil giant's attempts to rebuild its reputation after the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

A pipeline at BP's 30,000 barrel per day Lisburne field, which is closed for maintenance, ruptured during testing and spilled methanol and oily water on to the tundra, bringing risks to slow-growing vegetation. The stretch of pipeline will have to be dug up to investigate why it failed.

The Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation said the spill amounted to 2,100 to 4,200 gallons and the field would remain closed.

A BP spokesman said the clean-up was under way and the company would determine the cause "in due course".

cookie
udonmap.com
Posts: 2235
Joined: September 29, 2006, 8:52 pm

BP

Post by cookie » July 23, 2011, 12:01 pm

The government’s chief investigation into last year’s Deepwater Horizon disaster will not be complete by a July 27 deadline, officials confirmed today.
BP’s $7.2 billion Reliance oil, gas deal gets India approval
Posted on July 22, 2011 at 11:20 am by Bloomberg in Drilling, Economics, Oil




BP Plc, Europe’s second-largest oil company, won approval from India’s Cabinet for a $7.2 billion deal to buy stakes in Reliance Industries Ltd.’s oil and natural gas blocks, five months after announcing the accord.

BP will acquire a 30 percent interest in 21 of 23 blocks proposed by Reliance, Oil Minister S. Jaipal Reddy said after a Cabinet meeting in New Delhi today. “Our ministry recommended only 21 blocks. For technical reasons, we didn’t recommend two other blocks,” Reddy said.

The deal puts BP closer to regions that it predicts will generate the majority of energy demand growth for the next 20 years. Reliance will get access to technology and expertise to develop deepwater fields and help reverse declining gas output from India’s biggest deposit, called KG-D6, where production has dropped about 22 percent in the past year because of technical difficulties.

India’s oil ministry recommended approval for the deal and referred it to the Cabinet because of the large investment involved, Reddy said.

The two additional blocks will be approved after the oil ministry and Reliance agree on exploration work in the areas, he said. The blocks aren’t producing oil or gas.

Energy Security

“BP is keen to be a long-term partner with India in its quest for energy security,” the London-based company said in an e-mail statement today. “We will now work to complete the commercial agreements with Reliance and move forward with this exciting venture.”

Reliance has declined 18 percent this year compared with a 8.7 percent fall in the benchmark Sensitive Index of the Bombay Stock Exchange. The stock gained 1.5 percent to 873.35 rupees at close in Mumbai.

Reliance’s net income grew at the slowest pace in six quarters in the three months ended March 31 after gas output fell.

The company is scheduled to report first-quarter earnings on July 25. Profit in the three months ended June 30 may rise to 56.6 billion rupees, according to the median estimate of 19 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg. That compares with net income of 48.5 billion rupees a year earlier.

‘Technical Issues’

“After the government approvals for the Reliance-BP partnership, the KG-D6 reservoirs will be jointly assessed to address the technical issues in ramping up production,” Reliance’s billionaire Chairman Mukesh Ambani told shareholders on June 3. The deal will be completed before March 31.

Reliance and BP will also form a venture to market gas, according to their Feb. 21 statement. Future performance payments and investments could increase the size of the deal to $20 billion, BP said that day.

Last year, BP signed a deal to explore off Brazil and sealed a partnership with Cnooc Ltd., China’s biggest offshore oil producer, for licenses in the South China Sea.

User avatar
old-timer
udonmap.com
Posts: 2620
Joined: January 13, 2009, 12:36 pm

BP

Post by old-timer » July 29, 2011, 3:28 pm

BP make serious profits, after paying out $6.8 billion in damages.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/mobile/business-14287697
More than $5million profit a day. Looks like they know what they are doing.

OT........ \:D/

cookie
udonmap.com
Posts: 2235
Joined: September 29, 2006, 8:52 pm

BP

Post by cookie » October 11, 2011, 2:48 pm

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/1 ... 61657.html

and one more federal report that confirms what I always said in the past:
BP bears ultimate responsibility for the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history, a key government panel said Wednesday in a report that assigns more blame to the company than other investigations and could hurt its effort to fend off criminal charges and billions of dollars in penalties.
The report concluded that BP violated federal regulations, ignored crucial warnings, was inattentive to safety and made bad decisions during the cementing of the well a mile beneath the Gulf of Mexico.
In the report, other companies shared some of the blame. Rig owner Transocean was accused of being deficient in preventing or limiting the disaster, in part by bypassing alarms and automatic shutdown systems. Halliburton, the contractor responsible for mixing and testing the cement, was faulted as well.
But BP, as the designated operator of the Macondo well, "was ultimately responsible for conducting operations at Macondo in a way that ensured the safety and protection of personnel, equipment, natural resources and the environment," the panel concluded.
Nothing more to add...... or perhaps:
"It is only a question of time before BP – along with Transocean and Halliburton – will face criminal charges for their roles in the Gulf oil spill,"
=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

User avatar
arjay
udonmap.com
Posts: 8349
Joined: October 2, 2005, 12:19 pm
Location: Gone to get a life, "troll free"

BP

Post by arjay » October 16, 2011, 10:09 am


User avatar
old-timer
udonmap.com
Posts: 2620
Joined: January 13, 2009, 12:36 pm

BP

Post by old-timer » October 19, 2011, 11:51 pm

Anadarko Petroleum Co. has agreed to pay $4 billion to BP PLC as part of a settlement related to last year's Gulf of Mexico oil spill, adding weight to BP's contention that it was not solely responsible for the disaster.
http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Lates ... ill-claims

OT............. \:D/

cookie
udonmap.com
Posts: 2235
Joined: September 29, 2006, 8:52 pm

BP

Post by cookie » April 25, 2012, 4:15 pm

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/2 ... ?ref=green

as predicted: the first charges and the first arrest....for destroying hundreds of messages....

Happy to see that arrests are finally being made.... but I think that this guy is just a scapegoat.


Kurt Mix, BP Engineer, Faces First Oil Spill Charges
Federal officials arrested a former BP engineer on charges of obstruction of justice on Tuesday, in the first criminal charges filed in connection with the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
Kurt Mix, 50, a senior BP drilling engineer, allegedly destroyed hundreds of text messages sent to a supervisor that described high volumes of oil flowing from the ruptured well, located 5,000 feet underwater, according to a federal affidavit.
BP´s answer:
BP added that it had "clear policies requiring preservation of evidence in this case" and said that it has undertaken "substantial and ongoing efforts to preserve evidence" in the criminal investigation into the spill.
BP clear policies=destroying hundreds of messages ???
"The courts will determine whether these actions were an obstruction of justice, but we already know that BP had a policy of obfuscation during the spill when it came to the amount of oil flowing out of the Macondo well," Markey said.
More criminal charges related to the spill could also be forthcoming. Investigations by the Coast Guard and an independent commission created by President Obama found that BP shared responsibility for the rig explosion with other contractors on the well, including Transocean, which owned the rig, and Halliburton, which poured the concrete designed to seal the well.

"The Deepwater Horizon Task Force is continuing its investigation into the explosion and will hold accountable those who violated the law in connection with the largest environmental disaster in U.S. history," said U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder in a statement Tuesday.

User avatar
UdonExpat
udonmap.com
Posts: 1434
Joined: June 9, 2007, 10:30 am
Location: 3rd rock from the sun

BP

Post by UdonExpat » November 16, 2012, 2:09 am

Well, BP has agreed to pay $4.5 Billion including $1.3 Billion in criminal fines. Two employees will be charged with manslaughter charges. The guy arrested in April is still under arrest. BP will plead guilty to 12 different felonies and 1 misdemeanor.

BP made $5.5 Billion in the previous quarter, so this is little more than a slap on the wrist of a criminal activity the size of BP.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/1 ... 36063.html

User avatar
KHONDAHM
udonmap.com
Posts: 2428
Joined: November 15, 2009, 3:07 pm

BP

Post by KHONDAHM » November 16, 2012, 4:16 am

UdonExpat wrote:BP made $5.5 Billion in the previous quarter, so this is little more than a slap on the wrist of a criminal activity the size of BP.
That's for criminal wrongdoing and does not protect them from the pending Federal civil suits. Civil damages should be astronomical if this is what Eric Holder got for criminal wrongdoing. Stay tuned! The fat lady is just entering the building...she hasn't even put on her makeup...
Enjoy this site much more by adding idiots to your ignore list (Friends & Foes tab).
http:\\www.udonmap.com/udonthaniforum/ucp.php? ... &mode=foes

User avatar
UdonExpat
udonmap.com
Posts: 1434
Joined: June 9, 2007, 10:30 am
Location: 3rd rock from the sun

BP

Post by UdonExpat » November 29, 2012, 5:13 am

BP has been temporarily banned from any new contracts with the USA. This should help push BP to settle civil suits.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/epa-tempo ... nance.html

Post Reply

Return to “General Debates & Discussions”