Did the US Really Put a Man on the Moon? Highly Unlikely.
Did the US Really Put a Man on the Moon? Highly Unlikely.
Did the United States Really Put a Man on the Moon?
https://journal-neo.org/2019/07/25/did- ... -the-moon/
https://journal-neo.org/2019/07/25/did- ... -the-moon/
- jackspratt
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 16079
- Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm
Re: Did the US Really Put a Man on the Moon? Highly Unlikely.
About as much credibility as Breitbart - although one could be forgiven for thinking they are both on the same side.
Re: Did the US Really Put a Man on the Moon? Highly Unlikely.
Right, Trump faked it. LOL!
-
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 465
- Joined: October 9, 2014, 4:36 am
Re: Did the US Really Put a Man on the Moon? Highly Unlikely.
The event was broadcast live on TV so it must have been real, right? LOLOL
- jackspratt
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 16079
- Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm
Re: Did the US Really Put a Man on the Moon? Highly Unlikely.
Buzz deserves an Oscar if he didn't get to walk on the moon. He has played the partly bitter and twisted runner up with distinction for many decades.
Lock 'em up - Eastman, Giuliani, Senator Graham, Meadows and Trump
Re: Did the US Really Put a Man on the Moon? Highly Unlikely.
If it was fake the Russians would have called the US out years ago …
- jackspratt
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 16079
- Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm
Re: Did the US Really Put a Man on the Moon? Highly Unlikely.
So, How would a person survive Van Allen radiation belt if landing on moon?
No one could survive the radiation belt between earth and moon, and no one can make a space suit in 1969 or even today to survive the radiation belt.
Must have gone around it, right?
No one could survive the radiation belt between earth and moon, and no one can make a space suit in 1969 or even today to survive the radiation belt.
Must have gone around it, right?
Re: Did the US Really Put a Man on the Moon? Highly Unlikely.
Implications for space travel
Comparison of geostationary, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Compass (MEO), International Space Station, Hubble Space Telescope, Iridium constellation and graveyard orbits, with the Van Allen radiation belts and the Earth to scale.[a] The Moon's orbit is around 9 times larger than geostationary orbit. (In the SVG file, hover over an orbit or its label to highlight it; click to load its article.)
Spacecraft travelling beyond low Earth orbit enter the zone of radiation of the Van Allen belts. Beyond the belts, they face additional hazards from cosmic rays and solar particle events. A region between the inner and outer Van Allen belts lies at two to four Earth radii and is sometimes referred to as the "safe zone".[28][29]
Solar cells, integrated circuits, and sensors can be damaged by radiation. Geomagnetic storms occasionally damage electronic components on spacecraft. Miniaturization and digitization of electronics and logic circuits have made satellites more vulnerable to radiation, as the total electric charge in these circuits is now small enough so as to be comparable with the charge of incoming ions. Electronics on satellites must be hardened against radiation to operate reliably. The Hubble Space Telescope, among other satellites, often has its sensors turned off when passing through regions of intense radiation.[30] A satellite shielded by 3 mm of aluminium in an elliptic orbit (200 by 20,000 miles (320 by 32,190 km)) passing the radiation belts will receive about 2,500 rem (25 Sv) per year (for comparison, a full-body dose of 5 Sv is deadly). Almost all radiation will be received while passing the inner belt.[31]
The Apollo missions marked the first event where humans traveled through the Van Allen belts, which was one of several radiation hazards known by mission planners.[32] The astronauts had low exposure in the Van Allen belts due to the short period of time spent flying through them. Apollo flight trajectories bypassed the inner belts completely, passing through the thinner areas of the outer belts.[25][33]
Astronauts' overall exposure was actually dominated by solar particles once outside Earth's magnetic field. The total radiation received by the astronauts varied from mission to mission but was measured to be between 0.16 and 1.14 rads (1.6 and 11.4 mGy), much less than the standard of 5 rem (50 mSv) per year set by the United States Atomic Energy Commission for people who work with radioactivity.[32]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt
Comparison of geostationary, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, Compass (MEO), International Space Station, Hubble Space Telescope, Iridium constellation and graveyard orbits, with the Van Allen radiation belts and the Earth to scale.[a] The Moon's orbit is around 9 times larger than geostationary orbit. (In the SVG file, hover over an orbit or its label to highlight it; click to load its article.)
Spacecraft travelling beyond low Earth orbit enter the zone of radiation of the Van Allen belts. Beyond the belts, they face additional hazards from cosmic rays and solar particle events. A region between the inner and outer Van Allen belts lies at two to four Earth radii and is sometimes referred to as the "safe zone".[28][29]
Solar cells, integrated circuits, and sensors can be damaged by radiation. Geomagnetic storms occasionally damage electronic components on spacecraft. Miniaturization and digitization of electronics and logic circuits have made satellites more vulnerable to radiation, as the total electric charge in these circuits is now small enough so as to be comparable with the charge of incoming ions. Electronics on satellites must be hardened against radiation to operate reliably. The Hubble Space Telescope, among other satellites, often has its sensors turned off when passing through regions of intense radiation.[30] A satellite shielded by 3 mm of aluminium in an elliptic orbit (200 by 20,000 miles (320 by 32,190 km)) passing the radiation belts will receive about 2,500 rem (25 Sv) per year (for comparison, a full-body dose of 5 Sv is deadly). Almost all radiation will be received while passing the inner belt.[31]
The Apollo missions marked the first event where humans traveled through the Van Allen belts, which was one of several radiation hazards known by mission planners.[32] The astronauts had low exposure in the Van Allen belts due to the short period of time spent flying through them. Apollo flight trajectories bypassed the inner belts completely, passing through the thinner areas of the outer belts.[25][33]
Astronauts' overall exposure was actually dominated by solar particles once outside Earth's magnetic field. The total radiation received by the astronauts varied from mission to mission but was measured to be between 0.16 and 1.14 rads (1.6 and 11.4 mGy), much less than the standard of 5 rem (50 mSv) per year set by the United States Atomic Energy Commission for people who work with radioactivity.[32]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt
Re: Did the US Really Put a Man on the Moon? Highly Unlikely.
You dang right we did. Several times.
What i never understood is why the program was scrapped. Use the resources to build more nukes and pacify the masses I guess.
What i never understood is why the program was scrapped. Use the resources to build more nukes and pacify the masses I guess.
Re: Did the US Really Put a Man on the Moon? Highly Unlikely.
Ya, and they even made a movie of "it"
How "it" was Done
"Capricorn One" in 1978
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z9yNHIolnM
-
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 61
- Joined: January 9, 2019, 12:02 pm
Re: Did the US Really Put a Man on the Moon? Highly Unlikely.
Hehe, I gotta get in on this one....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1D65NMBfmo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1D65NMBfmo