Harry and Sparkle
- stattointhailand
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 19114
- Joined: October 25, 2007, 11:34 pm
- Location: Oiling the locks on my gun case
Re: Harry and Sparkle
As he will now be able to be as biased as he likes without getting a b*llocking from his bosses he will be able to re-kindle his buddyship with "The Trumpster"
Re: Harry and Sparkle
Was it really worth losing his job as Chief Editor of a newspaper by allowing blatant lies about alleged atrocities by British Forces to be printed in an attempt to sell more copies. The man (term used loosely) is a self abuser of the lowest caliber.dunroaming wrote: ↑March 10, 2021, 7:30 pmPiers will have another job lined up that's guaranteed, wait and see u heard it here firstjackspratt wrote: ↑March 10, 2021, 8:57 amSeems he got a bit too hot.joepai wrote: ↑March 9, 2021, 3:54 pmSeems our Piers is getting a tad hot under collar...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsm2MGUpqCc&t=11s
Is it really worth losing your job over the mob from Westminster, London SW1A 1AA?Journalist and TV presenter Piers Morgan has left broadcaster ITV following long-running criticism of Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, that reached boiling point after the royal couple's interview with Oprah Winfrey.
Key points:
Britain's media regulator launched a probe after receiving 41,015 complaints about Morgan's comments
"Following discussions with ITV, Piers Morgan has decided now is the time to leave Good Morning Britain," ITV said in a statement.
"ITV has accepted this decision and has nothing further to add."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-10/ ... s/13232720
Re: Harry and Sparkle
What outlet you reckon then? RT?dunroaming wrote: ↑March 10, 2021, 7:30 pmPiers will have another job lined up that's guaranteed, wait and see u heard it here firstjackspratt wrote: ↑March 10, 2021, 8:57 amSeems he got a bit too hot.joepai wrote: ↑March 9, 2021, 3:54 pmSeems our Piers is getting a tad hot under collar...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsm2MGUpqCc&t=11s
Is it really worth losing your job over the mob from Westminster, London SW1A 1AA?Journalist and TV presenter Piers Morgan has left broadcaster ITV following long-running criticism of Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, that reached boiling point after the royal couple's interview with Oprah Winfrey.
Key points:
Britain's media regulator launched a probe after receiving 41,015 complaints about Morgan's comments
"Following discussions with ITV, Piers Morgan has decided now is the time to leave Good Morning Britain," ITV said in a statement.
"ITV has accepted this decision and has nothing further to add."
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-10/ ... s/13232720
- stattointhailand
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 19114
- Joined: October 25, 2007, 11:34 pm
- Location: Oiling the locks on my gun case
Re: Harry and Sparkle
Probably Cameo
Re: Harry and Sparkle
From a purely personasl viewpoint which many will decry as they are of the argumentative type. This spat, was brought about because initially a man /husband thought in some instances quite rightly so, that his wife was being unfairly targeted because she was as is common knowledge of mixed blood . Further conversations INSIDE the family ( which happens in the vast majority of these cases ) , has sparked the wife to possible consider self harm. Now the question I ask what DID the husband do, sort it out then and there or just watch. This husband was a favourite of his grabdmother and yet felt unable to talk to anyone !!!!!"........really , accusing asll and sundry of ignoring him, not assisting him financially and made his wife feel rejected, This wife then said she did not know the restrictions and protocol required for many things.
When it was obvious with planning the Grandmother made sure that advice was not only offered but a personal assistant was also provided .
As far as I am concerned this is a Family spat, which occurs with every family and judging by comments in the media happens in every family and more so opften in families where marriages are mixed race as well.
What was revealed ( one side of this tale I might add ,( knowing full well that the other side will never reply in the same vein or by the same way ), is unpalatable , but when you only HEAR one siode of these conversations, I take 50% to be complete bulls***, and if what is loeft is rally bad then it must be so. However using that rule, it is not, accusations that children are not getting a title it was stated they are should get is not correct, as this child will get no title until his grandfather takes the throne or his uncle that is the LAW.
So as far as Iam concerned family spat, nothing to see or talk about . Choices have been made, words spoken, let them get on with it, but I say this as a final statement. A coup-le who sought to remove themselves from the public eye quoting privacy issues have spent a lot of time seeking public notoriety and this last interview is my point, to overtly attempt to trash an instution whose history goes back over 1000 years is self defeating . He may well be a Prince, but no longer A p[rince I recognise as for his wife a self obsessed woman who is calculating and does not have an emphathatic bone in her body , she speaks with forked tongue.
When it was obvious with planning the Grandmother made sure that advice was not only offered but a personal assistant was also provided .
As far as I am concerned this is a Family spat, which occurs with every family and judging by comments in the media happens in every family and more so opften in families where marriages are mixed race as well.
What was revealed ( one side of this tale I might add ,( knowing full well that the other side will never reply in the same vein or by the same way ), is unpalatable , but when you only HEAR one siode of these conversations, I take 50% to be complete bulls***, and if what is loeft is rally bad then it must be so. However using that rule, it is not, accusations that children are not getting a title it was stated they are should get is not correct, as this child will get no title until his grandfather takes the throne or his uncle that is the LAW.
So as far as Iam concerned family spat, nothing to see or talk about . Choices have been made, words spoken, let them get on with it, but I say this as a final statement. A coup-le who sought to remove themselves from the public eye quoting privacy issues have spent a lot of time seeking public notoriety and this last interview is my point, to overtly attempt to trash an instution whose history goes back over 1000 years is self defeating . He may well be a Prince, but no longer A p[rince I recognise as for his wife a self obsessed woman who is calculating and does not have an emphathatic bone in her body , she speaks with forked tongue.
-
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 3516
- Joined: February 28, 2008, 5:31 pm
- Location: On lookout duty ,spotting for snipers .
Re: Harry and Sparkle
I agree with Piers Morgan and do not believe much at what sparkle had to say .I notice harry didnt say a lot !
I also agree with K P . sparkle is a self promoting , calculating , manipulative piece of work , who realised Harrys demons and insecurity very early on in the relationship , and has played him like a cheap fiddle ever since .
I also agree with K P . sparkle is a self promoting , calculating , manipulative piece of work , who realised Harrys demons and insecurity very early on in the relationship , and has played him like a cheap fiddle ever since .
Re: Harry and Sparkle
As someone who did marry a women of colour 30 odd years ago, acceptance by others can be a bit shallow. My ex-wife was penalised for her skin colour both professionally and within my family. It did make her paranoid and always 'looking' for these slights - one misjudged word spoken would just deepen her distrust. It did in the end help destroy the marriage.
My son once overheard a relative describe me as the 'black sheep' of the family - not sure if that was because of my African wife or the Thai one. What is said to your face and whispered behind your back is totally different.
Do you think the royal family, the royal court and the aristocracy were happy about the marriage? They are as bigoted as anyone, if not more so.
My son once overheard a relative describe me as the 'black sheep' of the family - not sure if that was because of my African wife or the Thai one. What is said to your face and whispered behind your back is totally different.
Do you think the royal family, the royal court and the aristocracy were happy about the marriage? They are as bigoted as anyone, if not more so.
- jackspratt
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 16156
- Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm
Re: Harry and Sparkle
UM's Bush Psychologists and Royal Insiders (generally one and the same) are having a field day with this.
Without them, we would all (if sufficiently interested) have to resort to reading the gutter Brit tabloids to know what is really going on.
Without them, we would all (if sufficiently interested) have to resort to reading the gutter Brit tabloids to know what is really going on.
- jackspratt
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 16156
- Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm
Re: Harry and Sparkle
I know that my parents would have preferred that I had settled with a 'local lassie' but they accepted both my foreign wives (not at the same time of course!).rick wrote: ↑March 11, 2021, 10:41 amAs someone who did marry a women of colour 30 odd years ago, acceptance by others can be a bit shallow. My ex-wife was penalised for her skin colour both professionally and within my family. It did make her paranoid and always 'looking' for these slights - one misjudged word spoken would just deepen her distrust. It did in the end help destroy the marriage.
My son once overheard a relative describe me as the 'black sheep' of the family - not sure if that was because of my African wife or the Thai one. What is said to your face and whispered behind your back is totally different.
Do you think the royal family, the royal court and the aristocracy were happy about the marriage? They are as bigoted as anyone, if not more so.
When I dated black girls in Houston, my mostly white peers at work would 'joke' about bringing me back to the light. One confided in wishing that he could do what I was doing.
After a while, one can tell the difference between racism and ignorance.
When the question of Archie's skin tone was first mentioned, the Duke of Edinburgh's splendidly irreverent "slitty eyes" comment to students in China came to mind.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-39806145
Re: Harry and Sparkle
Wow... did Meghan 'ghost' you as well?saint wrote: ↑March 11, 2021, 8:51 amI agree with Piers Morgan and do not believe much at what sparkle had to say .I notice harry didnt say a lot !
I also agree with K P . sparkle is a self promoting , calculating , manipulative piece of work , who realised Harrys demons and insecurity very early on in the relationship , and has played him like a cheap fiddle ever since .
Re: Harry and Sparkle
Maybe he should get together with this week's other Great English Quitter and swap crib notes on Donald. I am sure Farage is up for it.stattointhailand wrote: ↑March 10, 2021, 8:23 pmAs he will now be able to be as biased as he likes without getting a b*llocking from his bosses he will be able to re-kindle his buddyship with "The Trumpster"
Re: Harry and Sparkle
I'll have to, reluctantly, side with the sour Brittle gasbag Morgan on this issue -- a one-ring circus commanded by Orca Windfree. The effete, woke virtue-signaling soyboy prince is as vacuous as his chronically victimized narcissist wench. It was never going to end well.
Ashli Babbitt -- SAY HER NAME!
- jackspratt
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 16156
- Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm
Re: Harry and Sparkle
Good to see you back, giggler ......... I guess you have been sitting back and licking your QAnon wounds.Giggle wrote: ↑March 11, 2021, 12:39 pmI'll have to, reluctantly, side with the sour Brittle gasbag Morgan on this issue -- a one-ring circus commanded by Orca Windfree. The effete, woke virtue-signaling soyboy prince is as vacuous as his chronically victimized narcissist wench. It was never going to end well.
Especially good to see you haven't managed to pop in a racist reference - hopefully this signals a long overdue change of style.
- Laan Yaa Mo
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 9269
- Joined: February 7, 2007, 9:12 am
- Location: ขอนแก่น
Re: Harry and Sparkle
Yes, it is great to see Texpat is back. Now we can have some intelligent commentary and unbiased humour to digest. Get your thinking caps on boys and be prepared to roll.
Last edited by Laan Yaa Mo on March 11, 2021, 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You only pass through this life once, you don't come back for an encore.
- Laan Yaa Mo
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 9269
- Joined: February 7, 2007, 9:12 am
- Location: ขอนแก่น
Re: Harry and Sparkle
I can't stand Morgan, but he made a brilliant publicity move by making himself the topic of conversation. One can expect that he will land a high profile, high paying job within 6 months or so.Giggle wrote: ↑March 11, 2021, 12:39 pmI'll have to, reluctantly, side with the sour Brittle gasbag Morgan on this issue -- a one-ring circus commanded by Orca Windfree. The effete, woke virtue-signaling soyboy prince is as vacuous as his chronically victimized narcissist wench. It was never going to end well.
You only pass through this life once, you don't come back for an encore.
- jackspratt
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 16156
- Joined: July 2, 2006, 5:29 pm
Re: Harry and Sparkle
I reckon you give him far too much credit, Uncle. He was bordering on rabid during the relevant ITV breakfast show - certainly not a man in control of his thoughts and emotions (as far as I could see).Laan Yaa Mo wrote: ↑March 11, 2021, 7:46 pm
I can't stand Morgan, but he made a brilliant publicity move by making himself the topic of conversation. One can expect that he will land a high profile, high paying job within 6 months or so.
But you may be correct in one respect - these are probably essential criteria to land a job with Fox News.
Anyway, hopefully his desire will come true:
"Freedom of speech is a hill I'm happy to die on........
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-11/ ... s/13236676
- Laan Yaa Mo
- udonmap.com
- Posts: 9269
- Joined: February 7, 2007, 9:12 am
- Location: ขอนแก่น
Re: Harry and Sparkle
It would be difficult for Piers to more incompetent and obnoxious than he was with CNN. He made himself the centre of the news for a day or so with his comments on the ridiculous interview, and he quit a high profile show. These moves, I believe, will serve him well in the future, but not the viewing public. As our mutual friend wrote, 'He's a gasbag'.
You only pass through this life once, you don't come back for an encore.