joudon wrote: ↑

October 12, 2017, 2:24 pm

From a UK perspective, the left wing gutter media, BBC included has never give Trump a chance. He has recieved bad publicity from day 1 of his Presidency. The Global elite were aghast that their stooge candidate, Clinton was beaten! Trump won and like ' Brexit in the UK, the 'left wingers, champagne socialists, limousine liberals' cannot come to terms with the fact that ordinary people have now rejected Globalisation which seems only to benefit the rich.
Go for it Trump.

Once again the undeniable fact that Clinton was even less desirable and ultimately lost is regurgitated to try and illuminate and elevate the winners less than stellar global stature since he got hired.

The man wan't even supposed to have gotten close and only by grace of the GOP's own dithering, hand-wringing and partial but ongoing implosion did he manage to become the last-man-standing and garner so many reluctant, 11th hour endorsements. For every Democrat that was reluctant to throw their weight behind Hillary, there were at least a couple who didn't like Trump but their party didn't afford them any real choice. They GOP actually lost when he won.

We are lead to believe that he appealed to the common man in spades but has he come anywhere close on delivering any of those fanciful, living the dream, grandiloquent MAGA promises that the common man (and assumedly their common woman) was promised? I mean beyond a solitary coal mine and the free, red MAGA baseball cap that is? I hear he donated a golf trophy to the people of typhoon-ravaged US Gulf states and Puerto Rico. Now they'll have something for their leaking roof... but they'll have to pass it around, like the red cap.

tamada wrote: ↑

October 12, 2017, 4:45 pm

We are lead to believe that he appealed to the common man in spades but has he come anywhere close on delivering any of those fanciful, living the dream, grandiloquent MAGA promises that the common man (and assumedly their common woman) was promised?

He's done what one branch of the three branches can do alone, and he's even done it with questionable checks from the lower courts (that are being over-ruled by the SCOTUS).

There's no POTUS capable to doing it all himself. It would be unconstitutional.

newtovillagelife wrote: ↑

October 12, 2017, 4:42 pm

His latest interview with the esteemed journalist Hannity. Don’t you watch Fox News???
https://youtu.be/

Your link doesn't go to the interview. I haven't watched television in a decade or more.

newtovillagelife wrote: ↑

October 12, 2017, 5:02 pm

Like he cares about the constitution, or even knows what it’s about.

Source?

Your behavior is starting to resemble that of a troll.

newtovillagelife wrote: ↑

October 12, 2017, 4:04 pm

No, he actually said gains in the market offset national debt dollar for dollar. So if the market gains 5 trillion then the debt falls by 5 trillion. Do you get it.

He never said "gains in the market offset national debt dollar for dollar". I watched it all, and then watched the first ten minutes again.

This is what he said:

"I'm so proud of the 5.2 trillion dollars of increase in the stock market. Now when you look at the stock market, that's one element, but we have many elements.

"The country -- we took it over at 20 trillion -- as you know the last 8 years they borrowed more than it did in the whole history of our country. So they borrowed more than 10 trillion dollars. Right? And yet, we've picked up 5.2 trillion, just in the stock market -- possibly picked up the whole thing -- in terms of the first 9 months -- in terms of value. So you could say in one sense we're really increasing values and, maybe in a sense, we're reducing debt, but we're very honored by it, and we're very happy with what's happening on Wall Street."

So much for that claim.

Hopefully end up in GitMo with the rest of his cabal.

newtovillagelife wrote: ↑

October 13, 2017, 6:04 am

50 executive orders so far what a F'in Hypocrite........

Your boy Bayrack signed 276 EOs.

Most of Trump's have rescinded Obama's crackhead socialist agenda and spurred the economy. Go take a look at each one and review their content. Many of them are the driving force behind the stock market gains and overall positive public sentiment regarding the economy.


MAGA!

North Korea has substantial chemical and biological weapon arsenals. Kim Jong-un has other options besides nuking his adversaries. Particularly countries with very porous borders. He might already have some shxt stashed in the US. He's had it in Malaysia.

I think he's potentially one very dangerous dude and he also has a great propaganda department. He looks really cool in many a photo. He should lend Trump his photographer.

Doing the quick 'n' dirty math here, the 'boy Bayrack' (gotta love that dripping-with-racism moniker) averaged just under 2.9 EO's a month during his whole 8 years as an elected, eloquent, popular-vote winning, liberal, environmentally aware, tree-hugging, Nobel prize winning, lame duck, perpetual appeaser, man-loving, sell-the-farm, America-hating, crackhead, minority-enabling, possibly illegal alien, black, allegedly Muslim but Democrat POTUS.

Meanwhile the incumbent golfing, gaffe-prone, semi-literate, 11th-hour nomination, apprentice firing, last-ditch endorsed, pussy-grabbing, GOP straw clutching, morally bankrupt, multi-millionaire, tax-dodging, white honkey, -----stirring, fist-pumping, raa-raa, red-capped, war-mongering, small inauguration, fake news, alternative fact, Rebublican POTUS is already averaging 5.5 a month.

So when DT crashes and burns around the end of his undeniably, excitingly different but thankfully fore-shortened, 1-term. slo-mo train wreck White House wonderment, he should safely have a new world record in EO's.

...like it really matters?

Obama had the best part of 8 his years with both the House and Senate safely in partisan, no-deal, gridlocked Republican hands. EO's are quite handy in this scenario.

Meanwhile, Trump has to force his will on the people, disproportionately via Executive Order despite his party still holding almost all the cards in Congress. So what's his excuse? Yes, I know that those pesky Dems are obfuscating and unwilling to negotiate but hey, as Matt Damon famously said in 'Good Will Hunting"... "Howdya like them apples?!"

Just keeping it fair and balanced when one's yardtsick of Presidential efficacy appears to be the amount or EO's one needs to get the job done.... oh sorry, to get what they want.

GT93 wrote: ↑

October 13, 2017, 12:17 pm

North Korea has substantial chemical and biological weapon arsenals. Kim Jong-un has other options besides nuking his adversaries. Particularly countries with very porous borders. He might already have some shxt stashed in the US. He's had it in Malaysia.

I think he's potentially one very dangerous dude and he also has a great propaganda department. He looks really cool in many a photo. He should lend Trump his photographer.

Iraq has substantial chemical and biological weapon arsenals. Saddam Hussein has other options besides nuking his adversaries. Particularly countries with very porous borders. He might already have some shxt stashed in Syria. He's had it in Kuwait.

I think he's potentially one very dangerous dude and he also has a great propaganda department. He looks really cool in many a photo. He should lend Trump his photographer.

Deja vu... or are you still carrying candle for Dubya & Bliar.

newtovillagelife wrote: ↑

October 13, 2017, 12:35 pm

tamada wrote: ↑

October 13, 2017, 12:18 pm

Meanwhile the incumbent golfing, gaffe-prone, semi-literate, 11th-hour nomination, apprentice firing, last-ditch endorsed, pussy-grabbing, GOP straw clutching, morally bankrupt, multi-millionaire, tax-dodging, white honkey, -----stirring, fist-pumping, raa-raa, red-capped, war-mongering, small inauguration, fake news, alternative fact, Rebublican POTUS is already averaging 5.5 a month.

You missed RACIST!!!.....

You missed the POINT!!!.....

Why don.t you guys criticize the Thai leader as well? Is he perfect? Oh, sorry i forgot. You are living in a dictatorship where free speech is not allowed and you would be jailed or sent home for doing so. It is better than the usa right?

Well at least you know what he’s going to do next.

Trump refuses to certify 'one-sided' Iran nuclear deal in major US policy shift
http://news.sky.com/story/trump-to-rule ... l-11078995